Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis

Robert J. Fox, David H. Miller, J. Theodore Phillips, Michael Hutchinson, Eva Havrdova, Mariko Kita, Minhua Yang, Kartik Raghupathi, Mark Novas, Marianne T. Sweetser, Vissia Viglietta, Katherine T. Dawson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1151 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate) is in development as an oral treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, which is commonly treated with parenteral agents (interferon or glatiramer acetate). METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of oral BG-12, at a dose of 240 mg two or three times daily, as compared with placebo in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. An active agent, glatiramer acetate, was also included as a reference comparator. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate over a period of 2 years. The study was not designed to test the superiority or noninferiority of BG-12 versus glatiramer acetate. RESULTS: At 2 years, the annualized relapse rate was significantly lower with twice-daily BG-12 (0.22), thrice-daily BG-12 (0.20), and glatiramer acetate (0.29) than with placebo (0.40) (relative reductions: twice-daily BG-12, 44%, P<0.001; thrice-daily BG-12, 51%, P<0.001; glatiramer acetate, 29%, P = 0.01). Reductions in disability progression with twice-daily BG-12, thrice-daily BG-12, and glatiramer acetate versus placebo (21%, 24%, and 7%, respectively) were not significant. As compared with placebo, twicedaily BG-12, thrice-daily BG-12, and glatiramer acetate significantly reduced the numbers of new or enlarging T2-weighted hyperintense lesions (all P<0.001) and new T1-weighted hypointense lesions (P<0.001, P<0.001, and P = 0.002, respectively). In post hoc comparisons of BG-12 versus glatiramer acetate, differences were not significant except for the annualized relapse rate (thrice-daily BG-12), new or enlarging T 2-weighted hyperintense lesions (both BG-12 doses), and new T 1-weighted hypointense lesions (thrice-daily BG-12) (nominal P<0.05 for each comparison). Adverse events occurring at a higher incidence with an active treatment than with placebo included flushing and gastrointestinal events (with BG-12) and injection-related events (with glatiramer acetate). There were no malignant neoplasms or opportunistic infections reported with BG-12. Lymphocyte counts decreased with BG-12. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, BG-12 (at both doses) and glatiramer acetate significantly reduced relapse rates and improved neuroradiologic outcomes relative to placebo. (Funded by Biogen Idec; CONFIRM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00451451.)

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1087-1097
Number of pages11
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume367
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 20 Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Placebo-controlled phase 3 study of oral BG-12 or glatiramer in multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this