Phase II selection design trial of concurrent chemotherapy and cetuximab versus chemotherapy followed by cetuximab in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group study S0342

  • Roy S. Herbst
  • , Karen Kelly
  • , Kari Chansky
  • , Philip C. Mack
  • , Wilbur A. Franklin
  • , Fred R. Hirsch
  • , James N. Atkins
  • , Shaker R. Dakhil
  • , Kathy S. Albain
  • , Edward S. Kim
  • , Mary Redman
  • , John J. Crowley
  • , David R. Gandara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

60 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Randomized clinical trials failed to show a survival benefit for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors plus concurrent chemotherapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with preclinical data suggesting potential negative interactions. In contrast, pilot trials of the EGFR-targeted antibody, cetuximab, plus chemotherapy suggested enhanced antitumor activity. This randomized phase II trial was designed to select a cetuximab plus chemotherapy regimen for phase III evaluation. Patients and Methods: Treatment-naive patients with advanced-stage NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive paclitaxel (225 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve, 6) every 3 weeks plus concurrent cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250 mg/m2 weekly) for four cycles followed by maintenance cetuximab or sequential paclitaxel- carboplatin for four cycles followed by cetuximab. Results: Of 242 patients enrolled, 224 were eligible and assessable for response (106 and 118 patients in the concurrent and sequential arms, respectively). With a median follow-up time of 32 months, the median overall survival was 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.2 to 13.0 months) for patients receiving concurrent therapy and 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.5 to 12.8 months) for patients receiving sequential therapy (P = .57); 1-year survival rates were 45% (95% CI, 36% to 54%) and 44% (95% CI, 35% to 53%), respectively. Response rates and progression-free survival times were similar in both arms, as was grade 3 rash, whereas sensory neuropathy was higher in the concurrent arm (15% v5%in the sequential arm; P = .036). Conclusion: Although both regimens met the efficacy criterion for continued evaluation, the concurrent regimen of paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab was chosen.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4747-4754
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume28
Issue number31
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phase II selection design trial of concurrent chemotherapy and cetuximab versus chemotherapy followed by cetuximab in advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group study S0342'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this