Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics

Stuart A. Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

145 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical genetic testing has grown substantially over the past 30 years as the causative mutations for Mendelian diseases have been identified, particularly aided in part by the recent advances in molecular-based technologies. Importantly, the adoption of new tests and testing strategies (e.g., diagnostic confirmation, prenatal testing, and population-based carrier screening) has often been met with caution and careful consideration before clinical implementation, which facilitates the appropriate use of new genetic tests. Although the field of pharmacogenetics was established in the 1950s, clinical testing for constitutional pharmacogenetic variants implicated in interindividual drug response variability has only recently become available to help clinicians guide pharmacotherapy, in part due to US Food and Drug Administration-mediated product insert revisions that include pharmacogenetic information for selected drugs. However, despite pharmacogenetic associations with adverse outcomes, physician uptake of clinical pharmacogenetic testing has been slow. Compared with testing for Mendelian diseases, pharmacogenetic testing for certain indications can have a lower positive predictive value, which is one reason for underutilization. A number of other barriers remain with implementing clinical pharmacogenetics, including clinical utility, professional education, and regulatory and reimbursement issues, among others. This review presents some of the current opportunities and challenges with implementing clinical pharmacogenetic testing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)987-995
Number of pages9
JournalGenetics in Medicine
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2011

Keywords

  • Clinical pharmacogenetics
  • genetic testing
  • molecular genetics
  • personalized medicine
  • pharmacogenomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personalizing medicine with clinical pharmacogenetics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this