TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft in left main coronary artery disease
T2 - A comprehensive meta-analysis of adjusted observational studies and randomized controlled trials
AU - Bertaina, Maurizio
AU - De Filippo, Ovidio
AU - Iannaccone, Mario
AU - Colombo, Antonio
AU - Stone, Gregg
AU - Serruys, Patrick
AU - Mancone, Massimo
AU - Omedè, Pierluigi
AU - Conrotto, Federico
AU - Pennone, Mauro
AU - Kimura, Takeshi
AU - Kawamoto, Hiroyoshi
AU - Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi
AU - Sheiban, Imad
AU - Templin, Christian
AU - Benedetto, Umberto
AU - Cavalcante, Rafael
AU - D'Amico, Maurizio
AU - Gaudino, Mario
AU - Moretti, Claudio
AU - Gaita, Fiorenzo
AU - D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Italian Federation of Cardiology - I.F.C. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Background: Treatment of patients with ULMCA (unprotected left main coronary artery disease) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), without conclusive results. Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with multivariate analysis comparing PCI and CABG for ULMCA were included. Major cardiovascular events (MACEs, composite of all-cause death, MI, definite or probable ST, target vessel revascularization and stroke) were the primary end points, whereas its single components were the secondary ones, along with stent thrombosis, graft occlusion and in-hospital death and stroke. Subgroup analyses were performed according to Syntax score. Results: Six RCTs (4717 patients) and 20 observational studies with multivariate adjustment (14 597 patients) were included. After 5 (3 - 5.5) years, MACE rate was higher for PCI [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 - 1.14], without difference in death, whereas more relevant risk of MI was because of observational studies. Coronary stenting increased risk of revascularization (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.34 - 1.72). At meta-regression, performance of PCI was improved by use of intra-coronary imaging and worsened by first generation stents, whereas two arterial grafts increased benefit of CABG. For patients with Syntax score less than 22, MACE rates did not differ, whereas for higher values, CABG reduced MACE because of lower risk of revascularization. Incidence of graft occlusion was 3.24% (2.25-4.23), whereas 2.13% (1.28-2.98: all CI 95%) of patients experienced stent thrombosis. Conclusion: Surgical revascularization reduces risk of revascularization for ULMCA patients, especially for those with Syntax score greater than 22, with a higher risk of in-hospital death. Intra-coronary imaging and use of arterial grafts improved performance of revascularization strategies.
AB - Background: Treatment of patients with ULMCA (unprotected left main coronary artery disease) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), without conclusive results. Methods: All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies with multivariate analysis comparing PCI and CABG for ULMCA were included. Major cardiovascular events (MACEs, composite of all-cause death, MI, definite or probable ST, target vessel revascularization and stroke) were the primary end points, whereas its single components were the secondary ones, along with stent thrombosis, graft occlusion and in-hospital death and stroke. Subgroup analyses were performed according to Syntax score. Results: Six RCTs (4717 patients) and 20 observational studies with multivariate adjustment (14 597 patients) were included. After 5 (3 - 5.5) years, MACE rate was higher for PCI [odds ratio (OR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 - 1.14], without difference in death, whereas more relevant risk of MI was because of observational studies. Coronary stenting increased risk of revascularization (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.34 - 1.72). At meta-regression, performance of PCI was improved by use of intra-coronary imaging and worsened by first generation stents, whereas two arterial grafts increased benefit of CABG. For patients with Syntax score less than 22, MACE rates did not differ, whereas for higher values, CABG reduced MACE because of lower risk of revascularization. Incidence of graft occlusion was 3.24% (2.25-4.23), whereas 2.13% (1.28-2.98: all CI 95%) of patients experienced stent thrombosis. Conclusion: Surgical revascularization reduces risk of revascularization for ULMCA patients, especially for those with Syntax score greater than 22, with a higher risk of in-hospital death. Intra-coronary imaging and use of arterial grafts improved performance of revascularization strategies.
KW - Coronary artery bypass graft
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Left main
KW - Left main percutaneous
KW - Percutaneous coronary intervention
KW - Surgery
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85059829784
U2 - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000703
DO - 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000703
M3 - Article
C2 - 30095584
AN - SCOPUS:85059829784
SN - 1558-2027
VL - 19
SP - 554
EP - 563
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
IS - 10
ER -