Abstract
Management of the intraocular lens (IOL) at the time of penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy has been based on lens-related factors and coexisting anterior segment abnormalities. The authors reviewed the results of PK for 102 cases of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (43 anterior chamber, 50 iris-supported, and 9 posterior chamber) with respect to: (1) the type of IOL, (2) coexisting abnormalities, and (3) management of the IOL at surgery. Graft failure after 2 years of follow-up was: (1) retained iris-supported IOLs, 9%; (2) retained anterior chamber IOLs, 60%; (3) retained posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOL), 0%; (4) removed IOLs, 9%; and (5) exchanged IOLs, 20%. After 5 years of follow-up, 13 of 13 PKs with retained closed-loop anterior chamber IOLs had failed. Visual results were best in eyes with retained iris-supported, rigid anterior chamber or PC IOLs and when the IOL was removed without replacement. The authors recommend that closed-loop anterior chamber lenses and unstable lenses of any type be removed or exchanged and that well-fixated PC IOLs and iris-clip IOLs be retained at the time of PK for pseudophakic bullous keratopathy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1260-1268 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Ophthalmology |
| Volume | 95 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1988 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- anterior chamber intraocular lenses
- corneal transplant failure
- intraocular lens complications
- intraocular lens exchange
- intraocular lens removal
- iris-supported intraocular lenses
- penetrating keratoplasty
- posterior chamber intraocular lenses
- pseudophakic bullous keratopathy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Penetrating Keratoplasty for Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy: Management of the Intraocular Lens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver