TY - JOUR
T1 - PD-L1 as a biomarker of response to immune-checkpoint inhibitors
AU - Doroshow, Deborah Blythe
AU - Bhalla, Sheena
AU - Beasley, Mary Beth
AU - Sholl, Lynette M.
AU - Kerr, Keith M.
AU - Gnjatic, Sacha
AU - Wistuba, Ignacio I.
AU - Rimm, David L.
AU - Tsao, Ming Sound
AU - Hirsch, Fred R.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Immune-checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 have already substantially improved the outcomes of patients with many types of cancer, although only 20–40% of patients derive benefit from these new therapies. PD-L1, quantified using immunohistochemistry assays, is currently the most widely validated, used and accepted biomarker to guide the selection of patients to receive anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. However, many challenges remain in the clinical use of these assays, including the necessity of using different companion diagnostic assays for specific agents, high levels of inter-assay variability in terms of both performance and cut-off points, and a lack of prospective comparisons of how PD-L1+ disease diagnosed using each assay relates to clinical outcomes. In this Review, we describe the current role of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays used to inform the selection of patients to receive anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies, we discuss the various technical and clinical challenges associated with these assays, including regulatory issues, and we provide some perspective on how to optimize PD-L1 as a selection biomarker for the future treatment of patients with solid tumours.
AB - Immune-checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 have already substantially improved the outcomes of patients with many types of cancer, although only 20–40% of patients derive benefit from these new therapies. PD-L1, quantified using immunohistochemistry assays, is currently the most widely validated, used and accepted biomarker to guide the selection of patients to receive anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies. However, many challenges remain in the clinical use of these assays, including the necessity of using different companion diagnostic assays for specific agents, high levels of inter-assay variability in terms of both performance and cut-off points, and a lack of prospective comparisons of how PD-L1+ disease diagnosed using each assay relates to clinical outcomes. In this Review, we describe the current role of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays used to inform the selection of patients to receive anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies, we discuss the various technical and clinical challenges associated with these assays, including regulatory issues, and we provide some perspective on how to optimize PD-L1 as a selection biomarker for the future treatment of patients with solid tumours.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100990866&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41571-021-00473-5
DO - 10.1038/s41571-021-00473-5
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33580222
AN - SCOPUS:85100990866
SN - 1759-4774
VL - 18
SP - 345
EP - 362
JO - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
JF - Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
IS - 6
ER -