TY - JOUR
T1 - Patient selection for long-term secondary prevention with ticagrelor
T2 - insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54
AU - Bonaca, Marc P.
AU - Im, Kyung Ah
AU - Magnani, Giulia
AU - Bansilal, Sameer
AU - Dellborg, Mikael
AU - Storey, Robert F.
AU - Bhatt, Deepak L.
AU - Gabriel Steg, P.
AU - Cohen, Marc
AU - Johanson, Per
AU - Braunwald, Eugene
AU - Sabatine, Marc S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/12/21
Y1 - 2022/12/21
N2 - Aim In patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) on aspirin, the addition of ticagrelor reduces ischaemic risk but increases bleeding risk. The simultaneous assessment of baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk may assist clinicians in selecting patients who are most likely to have a favourable risk/benefit profile with long-term ticagrelor. Methods PEGASUS-TIMI 54 randomized 21 162 prior MI patients, 13 956 of which to the approved 60 mg dose or placebo and and results who had all necessary data. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke, and the primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding; differences in Kaplan–Meier event rates at 3 years are presented. Post-hoc subgroups based on predictors of bleeding and ischaemic risk were merged into a selection algorithm. Patients were divided into four groups: those with a bleeding predictor (n = 2721, 19%) and then those without a bleeding predictor and either 0–1 ischaemic risk factor (IRF; n = 3004, 22%), 2 IRF (n = 4903, 35%), or ≥3 IRF (n = 3328, 24%). In patients at high bleeding risk, ticagrelor increased bleeding [absolute risk difference (ARD) +2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6, 3.9] and did not reduce the primary efficacy endpoint (ARD +0.08%, 95% CI −2.4 to 2.5). In patients at low bleeding risk, the ARDs in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor were −0.5% (−2.2, 1.3), −1.5% (−3.1, 0.02), and −2.6% (−5.0, −0.24, P = 0.03) in those with ≤1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively (P = 0.076 for trend across groups). There were significant trends for greater absolute risk reductions for cardiovascular death (P-trend 0.018), all-cause mortality (P-trend 0.027), and net outcomes (P-trend 0.037) with ticagrelor across these risk groups. Conclusion In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of patients with prior MI, long-term ticagrelor therapy appears to be best suited for those with prior MI with multiple IRFs at low bleeding risk.
AB - Aim In patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) on aspirin, the addition of ticagrelor reduces ischaemic risk but increases bleeding risk. The simultaneous assessment of baseline ischaemic and bleeding risk may assist clinicians in selecting patients who are most likely to have a favourable risk/benefit profile with long-term ticagrelor. Methods PEGASUS-TIMI 54 randomized 21 162 prior MI patients, 13 956 of which to the approved 60 mg dose or placebo and and results who had all necessary data. The primary efficacy endpoint was cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke, and the primary safety outcome was TIMI major bleeding; differences in Kaplan–Meier event rates at 3 years are presented. Post-hoc subgroups based on predictors of bleeding and ischaemic risk were merged into a selection algorithm. Patients were divided into four groups: those with a bleeding predictor (n = 2721, 19%) and then those without a bleeding predictor and either 0–1 ischaemic risk factor (IRF; n = 3004, 22%), 2 IRF (n = 4903, 35%), or ≥3 IRF (n = 3328, 24%). In patients at high bleeding risk, ticagrelor increased bleeding [absolute risk difference (ARD) +2.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.6, 3.9] and did not reduce the primary efficacy endpoint (ARD +0.08%, 95% CI −2.4 to 2.5). In patients at low bleeding risk, the ARDs in the primary efficacy endpoint with ticagrelor were −0.5% (−2.2, 1.3), −1.5% (−3.1, 0.02), and −2.6% (−5.0, −0.24, P = 0.03) in those with ≤1, 2, and 3 risk factors, respectively (P = 0.076 for trend across groups). There were significant trends for greater absolute risk reductions for cardiovascular death (P-trend 0.018), all-cause mortality (P-trend 0.027), and net outcomes (P-trend 0.037) with ticagrelor across these risk groups. Conclusion In a post-hoc exploratory analysis of patients with prior MI, long-term ticagrelor therapy appears to be best suited for those with prior MI with multiple IRFs at low bleeding risk.
KW - Long-term ticagrelor
KW - Myocardial infarction
KW - Net benefit
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144593511&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac402
DO - 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac402
M3 - Article
C2 - 36367709
AN - SCOPUS:85144593511
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 43
SP - 5037
EP - 5044
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 48
ER -