TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathophysiologic factors governing the variability of ischemic responses to treadmill and bicycle exercise
AU - Klein, Jacob
AU - Cheo, Susan
AU - Berman, Daniel S.
AU - Rozanski, Alan
N1 - Funding Information:
From the *Division of Cardiology and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; the bDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, St. Luke’s+Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York; and the Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York. Supported in part by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and by the KROC Foundation. J.K. was formerly the Save-A-Heart Fellow in Preventive Cardiology. Received for publication Dec. 3, 1993; accepted Jan. 16, 1994. Reprint requests: Alan Rozanski, MD, Section of Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac Stress Testing, St. Luke’s-Roosevelt Medical Center, 114th Street and Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10025. Copyright Q 1994 by Moaby-Year Book, Inc. 0002~8703/94/$3.00 + 0 4/I/5705%
PY - 1994/11
Y1 - 1994/11
N2 - Ischemic responses may vary considerably when patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are tested serially, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms that govern this variability have not been well evaluated. We thus evaluated whether clinical, hemodynamic, physiologic, and anatomic factors influenced the variability in ischemic responses among 140 patients (mean age 54 ± 11 years) subjected to both bicycle and treadmill exercise electrocardiography. Radionuclide ventriculography was obtained during bicycle exercise in each patient. The population included 77 patients with CAD, 21 patients with normal coronary arteriograms, and 42 patients with <5% likelihood of CAD. Bicycle exercise evoked higher systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) and double-product (p < 0.001) responses compared with treadmill exercise in the patients with CAD and in the normal subjects, and it evoked a lower frequency of chest pain (12% vs 41%, p < 0.001) in the 34 patients with CAD who had ST-segment depression during both exercise tests. There was a high frequency of variability in ischemic responses during treadmill versus bicycle exercise: 22 (39%) of the 56 CAD patients who had exercise-induced ST-segment depression manifested this response during one stress test only. This variability was strongly related to the functional and anatomic magnitude of disease. Ischemic variability decreased progressively as the response of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to exercise worsened progressively (p = 0.003 by analysis of variance), from 83% in those with an LVEF increase of >10% with exercise to only 13% in those with an LVEF fall of ≥5% with exercise. Similarly, ischemic variability occurred in 8 (89%) of 9 patients with single-vessel CAD versus 14 (30%) of 47 patients with multivessel CAD (p < 0.005). In conclusion, bicycle and treadmill exercise are different stressors, evoking different hemodynamic and clinical responses in patients with CAD. Ischemic ECG responses vary considerably when these patients undergo both stresses. This variability is governed by the functional and anatomic magnitude of ischemic heart disease. Variability in ischemic responses is reduced in the presence of multivessel coronary disease and in patients with abnormal LVEF responses to exercise.
AB - Ischemic responses may vary considerably when patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) are tested serially, but the pathophysiologic mechanisms that govern this variability have not been well evaluated. We thus evaluated whether clinical, hemodynamic, physiologic, and anatomic factors influenced the variability in ischemic responses among 140 patients (mean age 54 ± 11 years) subjected to both bicycle and treadmill exercise electrocardiography. Radionuclide ventriculography was obtained during bicycle exercise in each patient. The population included 77 patients with CAD, 21 patients with normal coronary arteriograms, and 42 patients with <5% likelihood of CAD. Bicycle exercise evoked higher systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) and double-product (p < 0.001) responses compared with treadmill exercise in the patients with CAD and in the normal subjects, and it evoked a lower frequency of chest pain (12% vs 41%, p < 0.001) in the 34 patients with CAD who had ST-segment depression during both exercise tests. There was a high frequency of variability in ischemic responses during treadmill versus bicycle exercise: 22 (39%) of the 56 CAD patients who had exercise-induced ST-segment depression manifested this response during one stress test only. This variability was strongly related to the functional and anatomic magnitude of disease. Ischemic variability decreased progressively as the response of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) to exercise worsened progressively (p = 0.003 by analysis of variance), from 83% in those with an LVEF increase of >10% with exercise to only 13% in those with an LVEF fall of ≥5% with exercise. Similarly, ischemic variability occurred in 8 (89%) of 9 patients with single-vessel CAD versus 14 (30%) of 47 patients with multivessel CAD (p < 0.005). In conclusion, bicycle and treadmill exercise are different stressors, evoking different hemodynamic and clinical responses in patients with CAD. Ischemic ECG responses vary considerably when these patients undergo both stresses. This variability is governed by the functional and anatomic magnitude of ischemic heart disease. Variability in ischemic responses is reduced in the presence of multivessel coronary disease and in patients with abnormal LVEF responses to exercise.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027972832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90594-0
DO - 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90594-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 7942489
AN - SCOPUS:0027972832
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 128
SP - 948
EP - 955
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -