Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis; "What" is still more important than "when"

Mark I. Evans, Michelle A. Sobiecki, Eric L. Krivchenia, Debra A. Duquette, Arie Drugan, Roderick F. Hume, Mark P. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

54 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine if parental decisions to continue or terminate following the diagnosis of a cytogenetic abnormality have changed over the past 8 years at the same center. Parental decisions in 310 prenatal chromosomal abnormalities were stratified by procedure (chorionic villus sampling [CVS] vs. amniocentesis) and the severity of the anomaly (severe vs mildmoderate). Patients with severe anomalies were much more likely to terminate regardless of gestational age. There was a trend (P = .107) toward a lower rate of termination for mild-moderate degrees in the second trimester. There was no change in patient's decisions over time. Patients' decisions about termination are focused on the severity of the disorder and only marginally influenced by when in gestation the decision is made.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-355
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Feb 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Anomalies
  • Chorionic villus sampling
  • Chromosomal abnormalities
  • Prenatal diagnosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parental decisions to terminate/continue following abnormal cytogenetic prenatal diagnosis; "What" is still more important than "when"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this