Palliation Versus Observation: Nonresectable AVMs

  • Justin E. Vranic
  • , Robert W. Regenhardt
  • , Aman B. Patel

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

Non-resectable intracranial AVMs (iAVMs) pose unique challenges to neurosurgical management, as their location within eloquent regions of the brain, large nidal size, and/or presence of deep venous drainage preclude safe microsurgical resection for cure, while the lesions themselves continue to pose an inherent hemorrhage risk and may produce neurological symptoms. AVM hemorrhage risk must be assessed on a case-by-case basis with the neurointerventionalist giving ample consideration to both the angioarchitectural features of the lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patient. Endovascular therapy may be utilized in appropriately selected patients to occlude high-risk AVM angiographic features in an attempt to reduce lesional hemorrhage risk or to treat symptoms related to intralesional vascular shunting. Alternatively, stereotactic radiosurgery may be used to treat other non-resectable iAVMs with the goal of achieving either cure or symptom palliation. In cases of asymptomatic non-resectable iAVMs that lack high-risk angiographic features, close clinical and radiologic observation may represent viable management strategy..

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationIntracranial Arteriovenous Malformations
Subtitle of host publicationEssentials for Patients and Practitioners
PublisherElsevier
Pages168-174
Number of pages7
ISBN (Electronic)9780323825306
ISBN (Print)9780323825313
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • AVM
  • Endovascular
  • Non-resectable
  • Observation
  • Palliation
  • Stereotactic radiosurgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Palliation Versus Observation: Nonresectable AVMs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this