Outcomes with cangrelor versus clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin: Insights from the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A clinical trial comparing cangrelor to clopidogrel standard therapy in subjects who require percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI])

Harvey D. White, Deepak L. Bhatt, C. Michael Gibson, Christian W. Hamm, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Matthew J. Price, Ph Gabriel Steg, Gregg W. Stone, Bernardo Cortese, Michael Wilensky, Efthymios N. Deliargyris, Tiepu Liu, Jayne Prats, Robert A. Harrington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy and bleeding outcomes of cangrelor in patients in the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A Clinical Trial Comparing Cangrelor to Clopidogrel Standard Therapy in Subjects Who Require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI]) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with bivalirudin. Background Cangrelor is a potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor with rapid onset and offset. In the CHAMPION PHOENIX, cangrelor compared with clopidogrel significantly reduced 48-h ischemic events including stent thrombosis, without increasing major bleeding. Bivalirudin has demonstrated ischemic outcomes similar to those with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, with reduced bleeding but increased early stent thrombosis. Methods In the modified intent-to-treat population, 2,059 patients (18.8%) received bivalirudin, with 1,014 patients in the cangrelor treatment arm and 1,045 in the clopidogrel treatment arm. Results At 48 h, the primary endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, or stent thrombosis was lower with cangrelor versus clopidogrel (48 [4.7%] vs. 70 [6.7%]; odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, p = 0.047). Death was similar in both arms (2 [0.2%] vs. 2 [0.2%]). Myocardial infarction was reduced by cangrelor (37 [3.6%] vs. 59 [5.6%]; OR: 0.63, p = 0.03), as was death/myocardial infarction (39 [3.8%] vs. 61 [5.8%]; OR: 0.65, p = 0.04). Cangrelor was associated with a nonsignificant trend toward less stent thrombosis (7 [0.7%] vs. 15 [1.4%]; OR: 0.48, p = 0.10), which was evident within 2 h after percutaneous coronary intervention (p = 0.057). GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Arteries) severe bleeding was similar in both arms (2 of 1,021 [0.2%] vs. 2 of 1,055 [0.2%]) as were other bleeding definitions and transfusions. Efficacy and safety results were consistent in patients with stable angina, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (p for interaction: 0.62 and 0.29). Conclusions Cangrelor may offer an attractive benefit risk profile when used in combination with bivalirudin.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-433
Number of pages10
JournalJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CHAMPION PHOENIX
  • bivalirudin
  • cangrelor
  • stent thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes with cangrelor versus clopidogrel on a background of bivalirudin: Insights from the CHAMPION PHOENIX (A clinical trial comparing cangrelor to clopidogrel standard therapy in subjects who require percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI])'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this