Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Yashasvi Chugh
  • , Rupinder Buttar
  • , Tak Kwan
  • , Evangelia Vemmou
  • , Judit Karacsonyi
  • , Ilia Nikolakopoulos
  • , Santiago Garcia
  • , Mario Goessl
  • , Yale Wang
  • , Ivan Chavez
  • , Anil Poulose
  • , M. Nicholas Burke
  • , Emmanouil S. Brilakis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance have been associated with better long-term outcomes, but adoption remains limited. There are limited data on the impact of IVUS on chronic total occlusion (CTO)-PCI. Objectives. To examine the impact of IVUS guidance on the outcomes of CTO-PCI. Methods. We performed a systematic review and study-level meta-analysis of IVUS vs angiography-guided CTO-PCI. Electronic databases were systematically searched for all pertinent studies from inception through January 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCT), registry data, and abstracts published in peer-reviewed indexed journals were included. We examined the following in-hospital and long-term outcomes: major adverse cardiac events; all-cause mortality; cardiovascular mortality; myocardial infarction (MI); target-vessel revascularization (TVR); target-lesion revascularization (TLR); and stent thrombosis (ST). We also evaluated the following procedural metrics: procedure time; fluoroscopy time; contrast volume; total stent length; and total number of stents. Random-effects models were used to pool individual study results. Results. Four (2 observational, 2 randomized) studies including 1975 patients (IVUS-guided PCI, 861 patients; angiography-guided PCI, 1114 patients) were included in the analysis. IVUS-guided CTO-PCI had similar all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, cardiovascular mortality, MI, TVR, and TLR compared with angiography-guided CTO-PCI, but lower risk of stent thrombosis (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.76; P=.02; I2=0%), shorter procedure time (P<.001; I2=88%), shorter fluoroscopy time (P<.001; I2=63%), and less contrast volume use (P<.001; I2=59%). Total stent length (P<.001; I2=39%) and total number of stents (P<.001; I2=72%) were lower with IVUS-guided CTO-PCI. Conclusion. IVUS-guided CTO-PCI is associated with lower risk of ST.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E310-E318
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CTO
  • IVUS
  • PCI
  • chronic total occlusion
  • intravascular imaging
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this