Outcomes for Thoracoscopy Versus Thoracotomy Not Just Technique Dependent: A Study of 9,787 Patients

Background: Studies reporting the benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lung cancer resection over thoracotomy have been subject to selection bias. We evaluated patient and hospital characteristics associated with type of surgery and the independent effect of VATS on outcomes. Methods: The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System of New York State database was queried to identify all lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy or sublobar resection between 2007 and 2012. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify patient (age, sex, race, comorbidities, year, and insurance) and hospital (urban, teaching, and total lung surgery volume) cofactors associated with surgical technique and propensity scores were used to evaluate whether technique was independently associated with complications or in-hospital mortality. Results: There were 5,505 lobectomy and 4,282 sublobar resection patients, with 2,318 (42%) and 2,416 (56%) undergoing VATS, respectively. For lobectomy, VATS was associated with being female, lower comorbidity index, private insurance, older age, surgery in recent year, nonteaching hospital, and higher annual lung surgery volume. For sublobar resection, VATS was associated with black race, lower comorbidity index, Medicaid or other insurance, surgery in recent year, rural hospital, and higher annual lung surgery volume. Complication rate was significantly lower for VATS lobectomy and not sublobar resection, whereas in-hospital mortality was lower for VATS in both resection groups. Conclusions: Numerous patient- and hospital-related variables that affect morbidity and mortality also affect whether a patient undergoes VATS or open lung resection. Studies evaluating VATS must account more accurately for selection bias and adjust for these confounders.