Outcomes analysis of anterior-posterior fusion for low grade Isthmic spondylolisthesis

  • Martin Quirno
  • , Jonathan R. Kamerlink
  • , Jeffrey A. Goldstein
  • , Jeffrey M. Spivak
  • , John A. Bendo
  • , Thomas J. Errico

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Traditional surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis is posterior-lateral fusion, but the addition of anterior surgery has been explored. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical and clinical outcomes of anterior-posterior surgical treatment for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods. Retrospectively, we enrolled 23 consecutive patients (mean age of 50) who underwent surgical treatment for low grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. The mean follow-up was 10 months. Basic demographic and radiographic data was collected. Pre- and post-surgical clinical surveys (VAS, ODI, and SF-36) were collected. Results. All 23 patients underwent anterior interbody fusion with a femoral ring allograft or ICBG in combination with posterior lumbar decompression and fusion with instrumentation. The average slip percentage decreased from 23.2% to 19.0% (p = 0.24) while slip angle increased from 9.8° to 17.9° (p < 0.001) and average disc height decreased from 1.9 cm to 0.80 cm (p < 0.001). VAS scores decreased from 7.1 to 2.4 (p < 0.001), ODI scores decreased from 52.5 to 28.1 (p < 0.001), and SF-36 scores increased in the Physical Component Scale (PCS) from 29.5 to 42.6 (p < 0.001). Conclusion. In our study, patients demonstrated an improvement in the ODI as well the physical component scores of the SF-36, thus having a good clinical outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)316-319
Number of pages4
JournalBulletin of the NYU hospital for joint diseases
Volume69
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes analysis of anterior-posterior fusion for low grade Isthmic spondylolisthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this