Outcome instruments for the shoulder

Amy S. Roller, Russell A. Mounts, Jeffrey M. Delong, Bryan T. Hanypsiak

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Outcome surveys may play a vital role in the future of orthopaedics. Institutions may increasingly look toward determining the effectiveness of treatment options, but different validation studies often yield different results. There is a clear need for consistency when reporting patient-reported outcome scores. Knowledge of the available outcome scores and their strengths and weaknesses will allow orthopaedic surgeons to practice evidence-based medicine, offer their patients the most appropriate treatments, and successfully navigate the increasingly complex reimbursement system. Orthopaedic surgeons will need to show conclusively that their procedures improved patient outcomes and were cost-effective. We conducted a review of upper extremity outcome systems commonly used in the shoulder and their scoring and validation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)955-964
Number of pages10
JournalArthroscopy - Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome instruments for the shoulder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this