Optimizing the precision-per-unit-time of quantitative MR metrics: Examples for T1, T2, and DTI

Lazar Fleysher, Roman Fleysher, Songtao Liu, Wafaa Zaaraoui, Oded Gonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Quantitative MR metrics (e.g., T1, T2, diffusion coefficients, and magnetization transfer ratios (MTRs etc)) are often derived from two images collected with one acquisition parameter changed between them (the "two-point" method). Since a low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) adversely affects the precision of these metrics, averaging is frequently used, although improvement accrues slowly - in proportion to the square root of imaging time. Fortunately, the relationship between the images' SNRs and the metric's precision can be exploited to our advantage. Using error propagation rules, we show that for a given sequence, specifying the total imaging time uniquely determines the optimal acquisition protocol. Specifically, instead of changing only one acquisition parameter and repeating the imaging pair until all available time is spent, we propose to adjust all of the parameters and the number of averages at each point according to their contribution to the sought metric's precision. The tactic is shown to increase the precision of the well-known two-point T1, T2, and diffusion coefficients estimation by 13-90% for the same sample, sequence, hardware, and duration. It is also shown that under this general framework, precision accrues faster than the square root of time. Tables of optimal parameters are provided for various experimental scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-387
Number of pages8
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume57
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Averaging
  • Quantitative MRI
  • Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR)
  • T
  • T precision

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing the precision-per-unit-time of quantitative MR metrics: Examples for T1, T2, and DTI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this