Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis

Renato D. Lopes, Hwanhee Hong, Ralf E. Harskamp, Deepak L. Bhatt, Roxana Mehran, Christopher P. Cannon, Christopher B. Granger, Freek W.A. Verheugt, Jianghao Li, Jurriën M. Ten Berg, Nikolaus Sarafoff, Pascal Vranckx, Andreas Goette, C. Michael Gibson, John H. Alexander

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: Antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) presents a balancing act with regard to bleeding and ischemic risks. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4 antithrombotic regimens by conducting an up-to-date network meta-analysis and to identify the optimal treatment for patients with AF undergoing PCI. Data Sources: Online computerized database (MEDLINE). Study Selection: Five randomized studies were included (N = 11542; WOEST, PIONEER AF-PCI, RE-DUAL PCI, AUGUSTUS, ENTRUST-AF PCI). Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used in this network meta-analysis, in which bayesian random-effects models were applied. The data were analyzed from September 9 to 29, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary safety outcome was thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding and the primary efficacy outcome was trial-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Results: The total number of participants included in the study was 11 532. The mean age of the participants ranged from 70 to 72 years, 69% to 83% were male, 20% to 26% were female, and the participants were predominantly white (>90%). Compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) plus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (reference), the odds ratios (ORs) (95% credible intervals) for TIMI major bleeding were 0.57 (0.31-1.00) for VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.69 (0.40-1.16) for non-VKA oral anticoagulant (NOAC) plus DAPT, and 0.52 (0.35-0.79) for NOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor. For MACE, using VKA plus DAPT as reference, the ORs (95% credible intervals) were 0.97 (0.64-1.42) for VKA plus P2Y12 inhibitor, 0.95 (0.64-1.39) for NOAC plus DAPT, and 1.03 (0.77-1.38) for NOAC plus P2Y12 inhibitor. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that an antithrombotic regimen of VKA plus DAPT should generally be avoided, because regimens in which aspirin is discontinued may lead to lower bleeding risk and no difference in antithrombotic effectiveness. The use of a NOAC plus a P2Y12 inhibitor without aspirin may be the most favorable treatment option and the preferred antithrombotic regimen for most patients with AF undergoing PCI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)582-589
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Cardiology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimal Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Network Meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this