Ocular microtremor (OMT): A new neurophysiological approach to multiple sclerosis

Ciaran Bolger, Stana Bojanic, Noirin Sheahan, James Malone, Michael Hutchinson, Davis Coakley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using a piezoelectric transducer, the frequency and pattern of ocular microtremor (OMT) between 50 normal subjects and 50 patients with multiple sclerosis were compared. Controls were age matched. All records were analysed blindly. The frequency of OMT in the normal group was 86 (SD 6) Hz, which was significantly different from that of the multiple sclerosis group (71 (SD) 10 Hz, p < 0.001). Those in the multiple sclerosis group with clinical evidence of brain stem or cerebellar disease (n = 36) had an average OMT frequency of 67 (SD 9) Hz (p < 0.001) compared with normal (n = 86), whereas those with no evidence of brain stem or cerebellar involvement (n = 14) had a frequency of 81.2 (SD 6) Hz (p < 0.05, n = 64). The differences between the two multiple sclerosis groups were also significant (p < 0.001, n = 50). At least one abnormality (frequency and pattern) of OMT activity was seen in 78% of patients with multiple sclerosis. In the presence of brain stem or cerebellar disease 89% had abnormal records whereas in the absence of such disease 50% had abnormal records. This is the first report of the application of this technique to patients with multiple sclerosis. The results suggest that OMT activity may be of value in the assessment of multiple sclerosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)639-642
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry
Volume68
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2000
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Brain stem
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Neurophysiology
  • Ocular microtremor
  • Physiological tremor
  • Piezoelectric

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ocular microtremor (OMT): A new neurophysiological approach to multiple sclerosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this