TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel strategies for evaluating and improving plastic surgery applicant selection
AU - Graziano, Francis D.
AU - Mavrommatis, Maria
AU - Shay, Paul L.
AU - Ingargiola, Michael J.
AU - Sanati-Mehrizy, Paymon
AU - Henderson, Peter W.
AU - Fang, Frank
AU - Taub, Peter J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Summary: Residency applicant evaluation and selection is a critical part of developing and maintaining a high-quality plastic surgery residency program. Currently, many programs rely on objective measures such as the United States Medical Licensing Exam scores, number of research publications, grade point average, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society status, or a combination of these objective metrics. However, there is a growing body of literature suggesting that the current means of residency applicant evaluation and selection may not be the best predictive factors of future resident success. The aim of this study was to identify nontraditional means of evaluating plastic surgery residency candidates and discuss how these means have been implemented at the authors' institution. After reviewing industry hiring practices, the authors propose that standardized interviewing and personality testing can help evaluate some of the previously intangible parts of an applicant that may play a role in teamwork, commitment, and dedication to patient care.
AB - Summary: Residency applicant evaluation and selection is a critical part of developing and maintaining a high-quality plastic surgery residency program. Currently, many programs rely on objective measures such as the United States Medical Licensing Exam scores, number of research publications, grade point average, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society status, or a combination of these objective metrics. However, there is a growing body of literature suggesting that the current means of residency applicant evaluation and selection may not be the best predictive factors of future resident success. The aim of this study was to identify nontraditional means of evaluating plastic surgery residency candidates and discuss how these means have been implemented at the authors' institution. After reviewing industry hiring practices, the authors propose that standardized interviewing and personality testing can help evaluate some of the previously intangible parts of an applicant that may play a role in teamwork, commitment, and dedication to patient care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120777262&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008572
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008572
M3 - Article
C2 - 34705807
AN - SCOPUS:85120777262
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 148
SP - 1040E-1046E
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 6
ER -