TY - JOUR
T1 - Nonproportional Hazards for Time-to-Event Outcomes in Clinical Trials
T2 - JACC Review Topic of the Week
AU - Gregson, John
AU - Sharples, Linda
AU - Stone, Gregg W.
AU - Burman, Carl Fredrik
AU - Öhrn, Fredrik
AU - Pocock, Stuart
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2019/10/22
Y1 - 2019/10/22
N2 - Most major clinical trials in cardiology report time-to-event outcomes using the Cox proportional hazards model so that a treatment effect is estimated as the hazard ratio between groups, accompanied by its 95% confidence interval and a log-rank p value. But nonproportionality of hazards (non-PH) over time occurs quite often, making alternative analysis strategies appropriate. This review presents real examples of cardiology trials with different types of non-PH: an early treatment effect, a late treatment effect, and a diminishing treatment effect. In such scenarios, the relative merits of a Cox model, an accelerated failure time model, a milestone analysis, and restricted mean survival time are examined. Some post hoc analyses for exploring any specific pattern of non-PH are also presented. Recommendations are made, particularly regarding how to handle non-PH in pre-defined Statistical Analysis Plans, trial publications, and regulatory submissions.
AB - Most major clinical trials in cardiology report time-to-event outcomes using the Cox proportional hazards model so that a treatment effect is estimated as the hazard ratio between groups, accompanied by its 95% confidence interval and a log-rank p value. But nonproportionality of hazards (non-PH) over time occurs quite often, making alternative analysis strategies appropriate. This review presents real examples of cardiology trials with different types of non-PH: an early treatment effect, a late treatment effect, and a diminishing treatment effect. In such scenarios, the relative merits of a Cox model, an accelerated failure time model, a milestone analysis, and restricted mean survival time are examined. Some post hoc analyses for exploring any specific pattern of non-PH are also presented. Recommendations are made, particularly regarding how to handle non-PH in pre-defined Statistical Analysis Plans, trial publications, and regulatory submissions.
KW - Cox proportional hazards
KW - clinical trials
KW - nonproportional hazards
KW - statistics
KW - time-to-event outcomes
KW - trial design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072758076&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1034
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1034
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31623769
AN - SCOPUS:85072758076
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 74
SP - 2102
EP - 2112
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 16
ER -