Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Non-HLA antibodies to immunogenic epitopes predict the evolution of chronic renal allograft injury

  • Tara K. Sigdel
  • , Li Li
  • , Tim Q. Tran
  • , Purvesh Khatri
  • , Maarten Naesens
  • , Poonam Sansanwal
  • , Hong Dai
  • , Szu Chuan Hsieh
  • , Minnie M. Sarwal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chronic allograft injury (CAI) results from a humoral response to mismatches in immunogenic epitopes between the donor and recipient. Although alloantibodies against HLA antigens contribute to the pathogenesis of CAI, alloantibodies against non-HLA antigens likely contribute as well. Here, we used highdensity protein arrays to identify non-HLA antibodies in CAI and subsequently validated a subset in a cohort of 172 serum samples collected serially post-transplantation. There were 38 de novo non-HLA antibodies that significantly associated with the development of CAI (P<0.01) on protocol post-transplant biopsies, with enrichment of their corresponding antigens in the renal cortex. Baseline levels of preformed antibodies to MIG (also called CXCL9), ITAC (also called CXCL11), IFN-γ, and glial-derived neurotrophic factor positively correlated with histologic injury at 24 months. Measuring levels of these four antibodies could help clinicians predict the development of CAI with >80% sensitivity and 100% specificity. In conclusion, pretransplant serum levels of a defined panel of alloantibodies targeting non-HLA immunogenic antigens associate with histologic CAI in the post-transplant period. Validation in a larger, prospective transplant cohort may lead to a noninvasive method to predict and monitor for CAI.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)750-763
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Society of Nephrology
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Non-HLA antibodies to immunogenic epitopes predict the evolution of chronic renal allograft injury'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this