No difference in the rate of change in telomere length or telomerase activity in HIV-Infected patients after three years of darunavir/Ritonavir with and without nucleoside analogues in the monet trial

Ajantha Solomon, Surekha Tennakoon, Edwin Leeansyah, Jose Arribas, Andrew Hill, Yvon Van Delft, Christiane Moecklinghoff, Sharon R. Lewin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) contribute to an accelerated loss in telomere length (TL) in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Design: Substudy of randomised controlled trial. Methods: Patients with HIV RNA ,50 copies/mL on combination ART (n = 256) were randomised to darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 800/100 mg once daily, either as monotherapy (n = 127) or with 2 NRTIs (n = 129) for up to 144 weeks. TL and telomerase activity was quantified on stored peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC; n = 124) using quantitative real time PCR. Results: Patients in the sub-study had a mean age of 44 years and had received NRTI for a mean of 6.4 years (range 1-20 years). As expected, older patients have significantly shorter TL (p = 0.006), while women had significantly longer TL (p = 0.026). There was no significant association between TL and either the duration of prior NRTI treatment (p = 0.894) or the use of a PI versus NNRTI (p = 0.107). There was no significant difference between patients who continued or ceased NRTI in the mean change/year of TL or telomerase (p = 0.580 and 0.280 respectively). Conclusion: Continuation versus cessation of NRTI treatment was not associated with an accelerated loss in TL or telomerase activity.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere109718
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume9
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'No difference in the rate of change in telomere length or telomerase activity in HIV-Infected patients after three years of darunavir/Ritonavir with and without nucleoside analogues in the monet trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this