Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: health-related quality-of-life analyses from the phase III CheckMate 901 trial

  • J. Bedke
  • , M. S. van der Heijden
  • , G. Sonpavde
  • , M. D. Galsky
  • , W. Liao
  • , L. Shi
  • , S. I. Blum
  • , S. Mitra
  • , M. Y. Patel
  • , T. Powles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: In the phase III CheckMate 901 trial, nivolumab plus standard-of-care gemcitabine–cisplatin chemotherapy followed by nivolumab monotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus gemcitabine–cisplatin alone in cisplatin-eligible patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Here, using patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from CheckMate 901, we report effects of adding nivolumab to gemcitabine–cisplatin on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients and methods: PRO assessments [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire—Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L)] were scheduled for both arms through the first 6 months of treatment (combination phase), and for the nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin arm thereafter (monotherapy phase). The prespecified primary PRO scale of interest was QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (QoL). Secondary scales of interest included QLQ-C30 physical functioning, role functioning, and fatigue, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale. Noninferiority analysis involved a mixed-effect model for repeated measures to estimate differences in least-squares mean changes from baseline to week 16. The proportions of patients with meaningful changes were calculated using prespecified thresholds. Results: In total, 524 patients were analyzed (nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin, n = 276; gemcitabine–cisplatin alone, n = 248). Overall least-squares mean changes through week 16 indicated the noninferiority of nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin versus gemcitabine–cisplatin alone for global health status/QoL and all secondary scales. At week 16, the proportions of patients with meaningful changes in global health status/QoL (improvement, 29.2% versus 23.0%; deterioration, 28.3% versus 30.4%) and all secondary PRO scales were similar in both arms. Conclusions: Adding nivolumab to gemcitabine–cisplatin did not worsen HRQoL compared with gemcitabine–cisplatin alone in the first 16 weeks of therapy. These findings support nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin as standard first-line therapy for cisplatin-eligible patients with unresectable or metastatic UC.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106089
JournalESMO Open
Volume11
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2026

Keywords

  • gemcitabine–cisplatin
  • nivolumab
  • patient-reported outcomes
  • quality of life
  • urothelial carcinoma

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Nivolumab plus gemcitabine–cisplatin for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: health-related quality-of-life analyses from the phase III CheckMate 901 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this