TY - JOUR
T1 - Netarsudil/Latanoprost Fixed-Dose Combination for Elevated Intraocular Pressure
T2 - Three-Month Data from a Randomized Phase 3 Trial
AU - MERCURY-1 Study Group
AU - Asrani, Sanjay
AU - Robin, Alan L.
AU - Serle, Janet B.
AU - Lewis, Richard A.
AU - Usner, Dale W.
AU - Kopczynski, Casey C.
AU - Heah, Theresa
AU - Ackerman, Stacey L.
AU - Alpern, Louis M.
AU - Bashford, Kent
AU - Bluestein, Ettaleah C.
AU - Boyce, James D.
AU - Branch, James D.
AU - Brubaker, Jacob W.
AU - Christie, William C.
AU - Cohen, John S.
AU - Collins, Nicole M.
AU - Corin, Scott M.
AU - Daynes, Todd Ellsworth
AU - Depenbusch, Michael
AU - Dixon, El Roy
AU - Duzman, Eran
AU - Flowers, Brian E.
AU - Flynn, William J.
AU - Fong, Raymond
AU - Gira, Joseph P.
AU - Goldberg, Damien F.
AU - Greene, Brennan
AU - Han, Scott B.
AU - Henderson, Thomas T.
AU - Jerkins, Gary
AU - Jong, Kevin Y.
AU - Katzen, Lawrence B.
AU - Khemsara, Vickas
AU - Klugo, Karen L.
AU - Kozlovsky, John F.
AU - Leonardo, Donna
AU - Liu, Yao
AU - LoBue, Thomas D.
AU - Luchs, Jodi Ian
AU - Malhotra, Ranjan P.
AU - Mays, Andrew
AU - McLaurin, Eugene B.
AU - McMenemy, Matthew G.
AU - Modi, Satish
AU - Moroi, Sayoko
AU - Mulaney, Jay
AU - Nagi, Kundandeep
AU - Nicolau, John
AU - Parikh, Mihir
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Purpose: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the Rho kinase inhibitor netarsudil and latanoprost vs monotherapy with netarsudil or latanoprost. Design: Three-month primary endpoint analysis of a randomized, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial. Methods: Adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (unmedicated intraocular pressure [IOP] >20 and <36 mm Hg at 8:00 AM) were randomized to receive once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil 0.02%, or latanoprost 0.005% for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3. Results: Mean treated IOP ranged from 14.8–16.2 mm Hg for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 17.2–19.0 mm Hg for netarsudil, and 16.7–17.8 mm Hg for latanoprost. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met the criteria for superiority to each active component at all 9 time points (all P <.0001), lowering IOP by an additional 1.8–3.0 mm Hg vs netarsudil and an additional 1.3–2.5 mm Hg vs latanoprost. At month 3, the proportion of patients achieving mean diurnal IOP ≤15 mm Hg was 43.5% for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 22.7% for netarsudil, and 24.7% for latanoprost. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported; treatment-related systemic adverse events were minimal. The most frequent ocular adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 53.4%; netarsudil, 41.0%; latanoprost, 14.0%), which led to treatment discontinuation in 7.1% (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC), 4.9% (netarsudil), and 0% (latanoprost) of patients. Conclusions: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated IOP reductions that were statistically and clinically superior to netarsudil and latanoprost across all 9 time points through month 3, with acceptable ocular safety.
AB - Purpose: To compare the ocular hypotensive efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) of the Rho kinase inhibitor netarsudil and latanoprost vs monotherapy with netarsudil or latanoprost. Design: Three-month primary endpoint analysis of a randomized, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial. Methods: Adults with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (unmedicated intraocular pressure [IOP] >20 and <36 mm Hg at 8:00 AM) were randomized to receive once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, netarsudil 0.02%, or latanoprost 0.005% for up to 12 months. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3. Results: Mean treated IOP ranged from 14.8–16.2 mm Hg for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 17.2–19.0 mm Hg for netarsudil, and 16.7–17.8 mm Hg for latanoprost. Netarsudil/latanoprost FDC met the criteria for superiority to each active component at all 9 time points (all P <.0001), lowering IOP by an additional 1.8–3.0 mm Hg vs netarsudil and an additional 1.3–2.5 mm Hg vs latanoprost. At month 3, the proportion of patients achieving mean diurnal IOP ≤15 mm Hg was 43.5% for netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 22.7% for netarsudil, and 24.7% for latanoprost. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported; treatment-related systemic adverse events were minimal. The most frequent ocular adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC, 53.4%; netarsudil, 41.0%; latanoprost, 14.0%), which led to treatment discontinuation in 7.1% (netarsudil/latanoprost FDC), 4.9% (netarsudil), and 0% (latanoprost) of patients. Conclusions: Once-daily netarsudil/latanoprost FDC demonstrated IOP reductions that were statistically and clinically superior to netarsudil and latanoprost across all 9 time points through month 3, with acceptable ocular safety.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069988132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.016
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31229466
AN - SCOPUS:85069988132
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 207
SP - 248
EP - 257
JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology
ER -