TY - JOUR
T1 - Negative Sagittal Balance Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
AU - Merrill, Robert K.
AU - Kim, Jun S.
AU - McNeill, Ian T.
AU - Overley, Samuel C.
AU - Dowdell, James E.
AU - Caridi, John M.
AU - Cho, Samuel K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/4/1
Y1 - 2018/4/1
N2 - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Elucidate negative sagittal balance following adult spinal deformity surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent long fusion (>5 levels) to the sacrum by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into cohorts of postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) <−10 mm, between −10 and +10 mm, or >+10 mm, denoted as groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Univariate analysis compared preoperative factors between the groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for developing a negative sagittal balance (SVA<−10 mm) following adult spinal deformity correction. Results: We reviewed 8 patients in group 1, 9 patients in group 2, and 25 patients in group 3. The average postoperative SVA for group 1, group 2, and group 3 were −30.99, +3.67, and +55.56 mm, respectively. There was a trend toward higher upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) in group 1 (T2) compared with group 2 (T10) and group 3 (T9) (P =.05). A trend toward lower preoperative SVA in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 was also seen (+53.36 vs +71.73 vs +122.80 mm) (P =.06). Finally, we found a trend toward lower body mass index in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (24.71 vs 25.92 vs 29.33 kg/m2) (P =.07). Based on multivariable regression, higher UIV was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor for developing a postoperative negative sagittal balance of <−10 mm (P =.02, odds ratio = 0.67). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that a higher UIV may predispose patients undergoing adult spinal deformity correction to have a postoperative negative sagittal balance.
AB - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: Elucidate negative sagittal balance following adult spinal deformity surgery. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of adult spinal deformity patients who underwent long fusion (>5 levels) to the sacrum by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2011 and 2015. Patients were divided into cohorts of postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) <−10 mm, between −10 and +10 mm, or >+10 mm, denoted as groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Univariate analysis compared preoperative factors between the groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine independent risk factors for developing a negative sagittal balance (SVA<−10 mm) following adult spinal deformity correction. Results: We reviewed 8 patients in group 1, 9 patients in group 2, and 25 patients in group 3. The average postoperative SVA for group 1, group 2, and group 3 were −30.99, +3.67, and +55.56 mm, respectively. There was a trend toward higher upper-instrumented vertebra (UIV) in group 1 (T2) compared with group 2 (T10) and group 3 (T9) (P =.05). A trend toward lower preoperative SVA in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 was also seen (+53.36 vs +71.73 vs +122.80 mm) (P =.06). Finally, we found a trend toward lower body mass index in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3 (24.71 vs 25.92 vs 29.33 kg/m2) (P =.07). Based on multivariable regression, higher UIV was found to be a statistically significant independent predictor for developing a postoperative negative sagittal balance of <−10 mm (P =.02, odds ratio = 0.67). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that a higher UIV may predispose patients undergoing adult spinal deformity correction to have a postoperative negative sagittal balance.
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - alignment
KW - negative sagittal balance
KW - sagittal
KW - spinal fusion
KW - upper instrumented level
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044822150&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2192568217699187
DO - 10.1177/2192568217699187
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85044822150
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 8
SP - 149
EP - 155
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 2
ER -