TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural history of severe chronic fatigue syndrome
AU - Hill, Nancy F.
AU - Tiersky, Lana A.
AU - Scavalla, Vanessa R.
AU - Lavietes, Marc
AU - Natelson, Benjamin H.
N1 - Funding Information:
From the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Center, Department of Neurosciences (Ms. Hill, Ms. Scavalla, Dr. Natelson), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Dr. Tiersky), and Department of Medicine (Dr. Lavietes), University of Medicine and Dentistry-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ. Submitted for publication February 11, 1999. Accepted in revised form March 26, 1999. Supported by National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Cooperative Research Center grant UO1-AI32247. No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated. Reprint requests to Dr. B. Natelson, New Jersey Medical School, 88 Ross Street, East Orange, NJ 07018. © 1999 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 0003-9993/99/8009-546753.00/0
PY - 1999/9
Y1 - 1999/9
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the natural history of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a severely ill group of patients at three points in time. Design: Patients were enrolled from April 1992 to February 1994 and were evaluated three times. Time 1 (at enrollment) history, physical evaluation, and psychiatric evaluation, Time 2 (median = 1 6yrs after initial evaluation) postal questionnaire to assess current condition, Time 3 (median = 1.8yrs after Time 2) medical and psychiatric evaluations. Setting: The New Jersey CFS Cooperative Research Center, an ambulatory setting. Patients: Twenty- three patients fulfilled the 1988 case definition for CFS and had symptom complaints that were substantial or worse in severity. All patients were ill less than 45 years, and none had a DSM-III-R psychiatric disorder in the 5 years before illness onset, none had substance abuse in the 10 years before enrollment. Main Outcome Measures: Severity of CFS symptoms was assessed by self-report questionnaires, laboratory tests, and medical examination. Psychological status was assessed using the Q-D15 and the Centers for Epidemiological Study-Depression Scale. At each time of evaluation, patients were categorized as severe, slightly improved, improved, and recovered. Results: Over the 4 years of the study, 13 patients remained severely ill, 9 improved but still fulfilled the 1994 case definition for CFS, and 1 recovered. Illness duration, mode of onset, psychiatric status or depressed mood at intake, or chemical sensitivity did not predict illness outcome. One patient was diagnosed with an alternate illness, but it probably did not explain her CFS symptoms. Mood improved for those patients whose illness lessened. Conclusions: The prognosis for recovery was extremely poor for the severely ill subset of CFS patients. The majority showed no symptom improvement and only 4% of the patients recovered Illness severity between Tunes 2 and 3 remained stable.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the natural history of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a severely ill group of patients at three points in time. Design: Patients were enrolled from April 1992 to February 1994 and were evaluated three times. Time 1 (at enrollment) history, physical evaluation, and psychiatric evaluation, Time 2 (median = 1 6yrs after initial evaluation) postal questionnaire to assess current condition, Time 3 (median = 1.8yrs after Time 2) medical and psychiatric evaluations. Setting: The New Jersey CFS Cooperative Research Center, an ambulatory setting. Patients: Twenty- three patients fulfilled the 1988 case definition for CFS and had symptom complaints that were substantial or worse in severity. All patients were ill less than 45 years, and none had a DSM-III-R psychiatric disorder in the 5 years before illness onset, none had substance abuse in the 10 years before enrollment. Main Outcome Measures: Severity of CFS symptoms was assessed by self-report questionnaires, laboratory tests, and medical examination. Psychological status was assessed using the Q-D15 and the Centers for Epidemiological Study-Depression Scale. At each time of evaluation, patients were categorized as severe, slightly improved, improved, and recovered. Results: Over the 4 years of the study, 13 patients remained severely ill, 9 improved but still fulfilled the 1994 case definition for CFS, and 1 recovered. Illness duration, mode of onset, psychiatric status or depressed mood at intake, or chemical sensitivity did not predict illness outcome. One patient was diagnosed with an alternate illness, but it probably did not explain her CFS symptoms. Mood improved for those patients whose illness lessened. Conclusions: The prognosis for recovery was extremely poor for the severely ill subset of CFS patients. The majority showed no symptom improvement and only 4% of the patients recovered Illness severity between Tunes 2 and 3 remained stable.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032869774&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90066-7
DO - 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90066-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 10489014
AN - SCOPUS:0032869774
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 80
SP - 1090
EP - 1094
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 9
ER -