TY - JOUR
T1 - National End-of-Life-Treatment Preferences are Stable Over Time
T2 - National Health and Aging Trends Study
AU - Skolarus, Lesli E.
AU - Lin, Chun Chieh
AU - Kelley, Amy S.
AU - Burke, James F.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work is funded by NIH/NIA R01AG059733 . They had no role in the study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Context: Advance Care Planning is a process of understanding and sharing preferences regarding future medical care. Objective: To explore individual and national stability of end-of-life treatment preferences among a sample of older adults. Methods: National Health and Aging Trends Study is a nationally representative sample of older adults. In 2012, a random sample, and in 2018, the entire sample were queried on end-of-life treatment preferences defined as acceptance or rejection of life prolonging treatment (LPT) if they had a serious illness and were at the end of their life and in severe pain or had severe disability. Using a cohort design, we explored individual trends in preferences for LPT among those with responses in both waves (pain scenario: N = 606, disability scenario: N = 628) and, using a serial cross-sectional design, national trends in LPT among the entire sample (1702 older adults in wave 2 and 4342 in wave 8). Results: In the cohort study, individual preferences were stable over time (overall percent agreement = 86% for disability and 76% for pain scenarios), particularly for older adults who would reject LPT in wave 2 (overall agreement 92% for disability and 86% for pain). In the serial cross-sectional study, national trends in preferences for receipt of LPT were stable over time in the pain (27.4% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.80) and disability (15.8% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.99) scenarios. Conclusions: We found that national trends in preferences for end-of-life treatment did not substantially change over time and may be stable within individual older adults.
AB - Context: Advance Care Planning is a process of understanding and sharing preferences regarding future medical care. Objective: To explore individual and national stability of end-of-life treatment preferences among a sample of older adults. Methods: National Health and Aging Trends Study is a nationally representative sample of older adults. In 2012, a random sample, and in 2018, the entire sample were queried on end-of-life treatment preferences defined as acceptance or rejection of life prolonging treatment (LPT) if they had a serious illness and were at the end of their life and in severe pain or had severe disability. Using a cohort design, we explored individual trends in preferences for LPT among those with responses in both waves (pain scenario: N = 606, disability scenario: N = 628) and, using a serial cross-sectional design, national trends in LPT among the entire sample (1702 older adults in wave 2 and 4342 in wave 8). Results: In the cohort study, individual preferences were stable over time (overall percent agreement = 86% for disability and 76% for pain scenarios), particularly for older adults who would reject LPT in wave 2 (overall agreement 92% for disability and 86% for pain). In the serial cross-sectional study, national trends in preferences for receipt of LPT were stable over time in the pain (27.4% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.80) and disability (15.8% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.99) scenarios. Conclusions: We found that national trends in preferences for end-of-life treatment did not substantially change over time and may be stable within individual older adults.
KW - Advance care planning
KW - end-of-life preferences
KW - older adults
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134837667&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.06.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 35764201
AN - SCOPUS:85134837667
SN - 0885-3924
VL - 64
SP - e189-e194
JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
IS - 4
ER -