TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter investigation of the reliability and validity of the live donor assessment tool as an enhancement to the psychosocial evaluation of living donors
AU - Kook, Yoon won Amy
AU - Shenoy, Akhil
AU - Hunt, Julia
AU - Desrosiers, Farrah
AU - Gordon-Elliott, Janna S.
AU - Jowsey-Gregoire, Sheila
AU - Trompeta, Joyce A.
AU - Vandrovec, Margo
AU - Weinberg, Sandra
AU - Fan, Weijia
AU - LaPointe Rudow, Dianne
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
PY - 2019/4
Y1 - 2019/4
N2 - The live donor assessment tool (LDAT) is the first psychosocial assessment tool developed to standardize live donor psychosocial evaluations. A multicenter study was conducted to explore reliability and validity of the LDAT and determine its ability to enhance the psychosocial evaluation beyond its center of origin. Four transplant programs participated, each with their own team of evaluators and unique demographics. Liver and kidney living donors (LDs) undergoing both standard psychosocial evaluation and LDAT from June 2015 to September 2016 were studied. LDAT interrater reliability, associations between LDAT scores and psychosocial evaluation outcome, and psychosocial outcomes postdonation were tested. 386 LD evaluations were compared and had a mean LDAT score of 67.34 ± 7.57. In 140 LDs with two LDATs by different observers, the interrater scores correlated (r = 0.63). LDAT scores at each center and overall stratified to the conventional grouping of psychosocial risk level. LDAT scores of 131 subjects who proceeded with donation were expectedly lower in LDs requiring postdonation counseling (t = −2.78, P =.01). The LDAT had good reliability between raters and predicted outcome of the psychosocial evaluation across centers. It can be used to standardize language among clinicians to communicate psychosocial risk of LD candidates and assist teams when anticipating postdonation psychosocial needs.
AB - The live donor assessment tool (LDAT) is the first psychosocial assessment tool developed to standardize live donor psychosocial evaluations. A multicenter study was conducted to explore reliability and validity of the LDAT and determine its ability to enhance the psychosocial evaluation beyond its center of origin. Four transplant programs participated, each with their own team of evaluators and unique demographics. Liver and kidney living donors (LDs) undergoing both standard psychosocial evaluation and LDAT from June 2015 to September 2016 were studied. LDAT interrater reliability, associations between LDAT scores and psychosocial evaluation outcome, and psychosocial outcomes postdonation were tested. 386 LD evaluations were compared and had a mean LDAT score of 67.34 ± 7.57. In 140 LDs with two LDATs by different observers, the interrater scores correlated (r = 0.63). LDAT scores at each center and overall stratified to the conventional grouping of psychosocial risk level. LDAT scores of 131 subjects who proceeded with donation were expectedly lower in LDs requiring postdonation counseling (t = −2.78, P =.01). The LDAT had good reliability between raters and predicted outcome of the psychosocial evaluation across centers. It can be used to standardize language among clinicians to communicate psychosocial risk of LD candidates and assist teams when anticipating postdonation psychosocial needs.
KW - clinical research/practice
KW - donors and donation: donor evaluation
KW - donors and donation: living
KW - health services and outcomes research
KW - kidney transplantation/nephrology
KW - liver transplantation/hepatology
KW - patient safety
KW - risk assessment/risk stratification
KW - social sciences
KW - transplant social worker
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058176994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ajt.15170
DO - 10.1111/ajt.15170
M3 - Article
C2 - 30414243
AN - SCOPUS:85058176994
SN - 1600-6135
VL - 19
SP - 1119
EP - 1128
JO - American Journal of Transplantation
JF - American Journal of Transplantation
IS - 4
ER -