TY - JOUR
T1 - Mri-guided focal laser ablation of prostate cancer
T2 - A prospective single-arm, single-center trial with 3 years of follow-up
AU - Mehralivand, Sherif
AU - George, Arvin K.
AU - Hoang, Anthony N.
AU - Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
AU - Rastinehad, Ardeshir R.
AU - Lebastchi, Amir H.
AU - Ahdoot, Michael
AU - Siddiqui, Mohummad Minhaj
AU - Bloom, Jonathan
AU - Sidana, Abhinav
AU - Merino, Maria J.
AU - Choyke, Peter L.
AU - Shih, Joanna H.
AU - Turkbey, Baris
AU - Wood, Bradford J.
AU - Pinto, Peter A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Turkish Society of Radiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - PURPOSE We aimed to assess post-interventional and 36-month follow-up results of a single-center, single-arm, in-bore phase I trial of focal laser ablation (FLA) guided by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). METHODS FLA procedures were done in-bore MRI using a transperineal approach. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety expressed as lack of grade 3 complications. Secondary endpoints were changes in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), sexual health inventory for men (SHIM), quality of life (QoL) scores, and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Treatment outcomes were assessed by combined mpMRI-ultrasound fusion-guided and extended sex-tant systematic biopsy after 12, 24, and optionally after 36 months. RESULTS Fifteen participants were included. Seven patients (46.67%) had Gleason 3+3 and 8 patients (53.33%) had Gleason 3+4 cancer. All patients tolerated the procedure well, and no grade 3/4 complications occurred. All grade 1 and 2 complications were transient and resolved com-pletely. There was no significant change in mean IPSS from baseline (-1, p = 0.460) and QoL (0, p = 0.441) scores following FLA but there was a significant drop in mean SHIM scores (-2, p = 0.010) compared to pretreatment baselines. Mean PSA significantly decreased after FLA (-2.5, p < 0.001). Seven out of 15 patients (46.67%) had residual cancer in, adjacent, or in close prox-imity to the treatment area (1 × 4+3=7, 1 × 3+4=7, and 5 × 3+3=6). Four out of 15 patients (26.67%) underwent salvage therapy (2 repeat FLA, 2 radical prostatectomy). CONCLUSION After 3 years of follow-up we conclude focal laser ablation is safe and feasible without significant complications.
AB - PURPOSE We aimed to assess post-interventional and 36-month follow-up results of a single-center, single-arm, in-bore phase I trial of focal laser ablation (FLA) guided by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). METHODS FLA procedures were done in-bore MRI using a transperineal approach. Primary endpoints were feasibility and safety expressed as lack of grade 3 complications. Secondary endpoints were changes in international prostate symptom score (IPSS), sexual health inventory for men (SHIM), quality of life (QoL) scores, and serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Treatment outcomes were assessed by combined mpMRI-ultrasound fusion-guided and extended sex-tant systematic biopsy after 12, 24, and optionally after 36 months. RESULTS Fifteen participants were included. Seven patients (46.67%) had Gleason 3+3 and 8 patients (53.33%) had Gleason 3+4 cancer. All patients tolerated the procedure well, and no grade 3/4 complications occurred. All grade 1 and 2 complications were transient and resolved com-pletely. There was no significant change in mean IPSS from baseline (-1, p = 0.460) and QoL (0, p = 0.441) scores following FLA but there was a significant drop in mean SHIM scores (-2, p = 0.010) compared to pretreatment baselines. Mean PSA significantly decreased after FLA (-2.5, p < 0.001). Seven out of 15 patients (46.67%) had residual cancer in, adjacent, or in close prox-imity to the treatment area (1 × 4+3=7, 1 × 3+4=7, and 5 × 3+3=6). Four out of 15 patients (26.67%) underwent salvage therapy (2 repeat FLA, 2 radical prostatectomy). CONCLUSION After 3 years of follow-up we conclude focal laser ablation is safe and feasible without significant complications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106178558&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5152/DIR.2021.20095
DO - 10.5152/DIR.2021.20095
M3 - Article
C2 - 34003127
AN - SCOPUS:85106178558
SN - 1305-3825
VL - 27
SP - 394
EP - 400
JO - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
JF - Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
IS - 3
ER -