TY - JOUR
T1 - Moving the needle on fall prevention
T2 - A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network scoping review and consensus statement
AU - The GEAR Network
AU - Hammouda, Nada
AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.
AU - Hung, William W.
AU - Lesser, Adriane
AU - Nyamu, Sylviah
AU - Liu, Shan
AU - Gettel, Cameron J.
AU - Malsch, Aaron
AU - Castillo, Edward M.
AU - Forrester, Savannah
AU - Souffront, Kimberly
AU - Vargas, Samuel
AU - Goldberg, Elizabeth M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funded by the Building the Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (R21 AG058926) and Hwang U (UH), the West Health Institute, and the John A. Hartford Foundation in support of the Geriatric Emergency Department Collaborative. CG's contribution to the manuscript was made possible by the Yale National Clinician Scholars Program and by CTSA grant TL1 TR001864 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA) K76 AG059983. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH.
Funding Information:
Funded by the Building the Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (R21 AG058926) and Hwang U (UH), the West Health Institute, and the John A. Hartford Foundation in support of the Geriatric Emergency Department Collaborative. CG's contribution to the manuscript was made possible by the Yale National Clinician Scholars Program and by CTSA grant TL1 TR001864 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA) K76 AG059983. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of NIH. The authors acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Tom Gill and Dr. Nancy Latham for providing the expert commentary provided in Appendix S4 as well as Libby Hoy for providing the patient summary in Appendix S5.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: Although falls are common, costly, and often preventable, emergency department (ED)-initiated fall screening and prevention efforts are rare. The Geriatric Emergency Medicine Applied Research Falls core (GEAR-Falls) was created to identify existing research gaps and to prioritize future fall research foci. Methods: GEAR’s 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders included patients, geriatricians, ED physicians, epidemiologists, health services researchers, and nursing scientists. We derived relevant clinical fall ED questions and summarized the applicable research evidence, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The highest-priority research foci were identified at the GEAR Consensus Conference. Results: We identified two clinical questions for our review (1) fall prevention interventions (32 studies) and (2) risk stratification and falls care plan (19 studies). For (1) 21 of 32 (66%) of interventions were a falls risk screening assessment and 15 of 21 (71%) of these were combined with an exercise program or physical therapy. For (2) 11 fall screening tools were identified, but none were feasible and sufficiently accurate for ED patients. For both questions, the most frequently reported study outcome was recurrent falls, but various process and patient/clinician-centered outcomes were used. Outcome ascertainment relied on self-reported falls in 18 of 32 (56%) studies for (1) and nine of 19 (47%) studies for (2). Conclusion: Harmonizing definitions, research methods, and outcomes is needed for direct comparison of studies. The need to identify ED-appropriate fall risk assessment tools and role of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel persists. Multifactorial interventions, especially involving exercise, are more efficacious in reducing recurrent falls, but more studies are needed to compare appropriate bundle combinations. GEAR prioritizes five research priorities: (1) EMS role in improving fall-related outcomes, (2) identifying optimal ED fall assessment tools, (3) clarifying patient-prioritized fall interventions and outcomes, (4) standardizing uniform fall ascertainment and measured outcomes, and (5) exploring ideal intervention components.
AB - Background: Although falls are common, costly, and often preventable, emergency department (ED)-initiated fall screening and prevention efforts are rare. The Geriatric Emergency Medicine Applied Research Falls core (GEAR-Falls) was created to identify existing research gaps and to prioritize future fall research foci. Methods: GEAR’s 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders included patients, geriatricians, ED physicians, epidemiologists, health services researchers, and nursing scientists. We derived relevant clinical fall ED questions and summarized the applicable research evidence, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. The highest-priority research foci were identified at the GEAR Consensus Conference. Results: We identified two clinical questions for our review (1) fall prevention interventions (32 studies) and (2) risk stratification and falls care plan (19 studies). For (1) 21 of 32 (66%) of interventions were a falls risk screening assessment and 15 of 21 (71%) of these were combined with an exercise program or physical therapy. For (2) 11 fall screening tools were identified, but none were feasible and sufficiently accurate for ED patients. For both questions, the most frequently reported study outcome was recurrent falls, but various process and patient/clinician-centered outcomes were used. Outcome ascertainment relied on self-reported falls in 18 of 32 (56%) studies for (1) and nine of 19 (47%) studies for (2). Conclusion: Harmonizing definitions, research methods, and outcomes is needed for direct comparison of studies. The need to identify ED-appropriate fall risk assessment tools and role of emergency medical services (EMS) personnel persists. Multifactorial interventions, especially involving exercise, are more efficacious in reducing recurrent falls, but more studies are needed to compare appropriate bundle combinations. GEAR prioritizes five research priorities: (1) EMS role in improving fall-related outcomes, (2) identifying optimal ED fall assessment tools, (3) clarifying patient-prioritized fall interventions and outcomes, (4) standardizing uniform fall ascertainment and measured outcomes, and (5) exploring ideal intervention components.
KW - alert devices
KW - emergency department
KW - falls
KW - geriatric nurse
KW - geriatrics
KW - multifactorial
KW - pharmacist
KW - physical therapy
KW - risk assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108221548&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/acem.14279
DO - 10.1111/acem.14279
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33977589
AN - SCOPUS:85108221548
SN - 1069-6563
VL - 28
SP - 1214
EP - 1227
JO - Academic Emergency Medicine
JF - Academic Emergency Medicine
IS - 11
ER -