TY - JOUR
T1 - Mouse-INtraDuctal (MIND)
T2 - an in vivo model for studying the underlying mechanisms of DCIS malignancy
AU - On behalf of the Grand Challenge PRECISION Consortium
AU - Hong, Yan
AU - Limback, Darlene
AU - Elsarraj, Hanan S.
AU - Harper, Haleigh
AU - Haines, Haley
AU - Hansford, Hayley
AU - Ricci, Michael
AU - Kaufman, Carolyn
AU - Wedlock, Emily
AU - Xu, Mingchu
AU - Zhang, Jianhua
AU - May, Lisa
AU - Cusick, Therese
AU - Inciardi, Marc
AU - Redick, Mark
AU - Gatewood, Jason
AU - Winblad, Onalisa
AU - Aripoli, Allison
AU - Huppe, Ashley
AU - Balanoff, Christa
AU - Wagner, Jamie L.
AU - Amin, Amanda L.
AU - Larson, Kelsey E.
AU - Ricci, Lawrence
AU - Tawfik, Ossama
AU - Razek, Hana
AU - Meierotto, Ruby O.
AU - Madan, Rashna
AU - Godwin, Andrew K.
AU - Thompson, Jeffrey
AU - Hilsenbeck, Susan G.
AU - Futreal, Andy
AU - Thompson, Alastair
AU - Hwang, E. Shelley
AU - Fan, Fang
AU - Behbod, Fariba
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Cancer Research UK and KWF Kankerbestrijding (ref. C38317/A24043) ( https://www.dcisprecision.org ); NIH‐R00 CA127462, NIH‐R01 CA207445, and NIH‐R21 CA226567 (to FB); KU Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA168524) and The Kansas Institute for Precision Medicine – COBRE (P20 GM130423) (to AKG); and Pilot Grant: NCATS Frontiers‐CTSA grant from NCATS awarded to the University of Kansas for Frontiers, ref# UL1TR002366 (to FB).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Due to widespread adoption of screening mammography, there has been a significant increase in new diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS prognosis remains unclear. To address this gap, we developed an in vivo model, Mouse-INtraDuctal (MIND), in which patient-derived DCIS epithelial cells are injected intraductally and allowed to progress naturally in mice. Similar to human DCIS, the cancer cells formed in situ lesions inside the mouse mammary ducts and mimicked all histologic subtypes including micropapillary, papillary, cribriform, solid, and comedo. Among 37 patient samples injected into 202 xenografts, at median duration of 9 months, 20 samples (54%) injected into 95 xenografts showed in vivo invasive progression, while 17 (46%) samples injected into 107 xenografts remained non-invasive. Among the 20 samples that showed invasive progression, nine samples injected into 54 xenografts exhibited a mixed pattern in which some xenografts showed invasive progression while others remained non-invasive. Among the clinically relevant biomarkers, only elevated progesterone receptor expression in patient DCIS and the extent of in vivo growth in xenografts predicted an invasive outcome. The Tempus XT assay was used on 16 patient DCIS formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections including eight DCISs that showed invasive progression, five DCISs that remained non-invasive, and three DCISs that showed a mixed pattern in the xenografts. Analysis of the frequency of cancer-related pathogenic mutations among the groups showed no significant differences (KW: p > 0.05). There were also no differences in the frequency of high, moderate, or low severity mutations (KW; p > 0.05). These results suggest that genetic changes in the DCIS are not the primary driver for the development of invasive disease.
AB - Due to widespread adoption of screening mammography, there has been a significant increase in new diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). However, DCIS prognosis remains unclear. To address this gap, we developed an in vivo model, Mouse-INtraDuctal (MIND), in which patient-derived DCIS epithelial cells are injected intraductally and allowed to progress naturally in mice. Similar to human DCIS, the cancer cells formed in situ lesions inside the mouse mammary ducts and mimicked all histologic subtypes including micropapillary, papillary, cribriform, solid, and comedo. Among 37 patient samples injected into 202 xenografts, at median duration of 9 months, 20 samples (54%) injected into 95 xenografts showed in vivo invasive progression, while 17 (46%) samples injected into 107 xenografts remained non-invasive. Among the 20 samples that showed invasive progression, nine samples injected into 54 xenografts exhibited a mixed pattern in which some xenografts showed invasive progression while others remained non-invasive. Among the clinically relevant biomarkers, only elevated progesterone receptor expression in patient DCIS and the extent of in vivo growth in xenografts predicted an invasive outcome. The Tempus XT assay was used on 16 patient DCIS formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections including eight DCISs that showed invasive progression, five DCISs that remained non-invasive, and three DCISs that showed a mixed pattern in the xenografts. Analysis of the frequency of cancer-related pathogenic mutations among the groups showed no significant differences (KW: p > 0.05). There were also no differences in the frequency of high, moderate, or low severity mutations (KW; p > 0.05). These results suggest that genetic changes in the DCIS are not the primary driver for the development of invasive disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121149422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/path.5820
DO - 10.1002/path.5820
M3 - Article
C2 - 34714554
AN - SCOPUS:85121149422
SN - 0022-3417
VL - 256
SP - 186
EP - 201
JO - Journal of Pathology
JF - Journal of Pathology
IS - 2
ER -