TY - JOUR
T1 - Motivational interviewing to improve health screening uptake
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Miller, Sarah J.
AU - Foran-Tuller, Kelly
AU - Ledergerber, Jessica
AU - Jandorf, Lina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd
PY - 2017/2/1
Y1 - 2017/2/1
N2 - Objective Health screenings, physical tests that diagnose disease, are underutilized. Motivational interviewing (MI) may increase health screening rates. This paper systematically reviewed the published articles that examined the efficacy of MI for improving health screening uptake. Methods Articles published before April 28, 2015 were reviewed from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Study methodology, participant demographics, outcomes and quality were extracted from each article. Results Of the 1573 abstracts, 13 met inclusion criteria. Of the 13 studies, 6 found MI more efficacious than a control, 2 found MI more efficacious than a weak control yet equivalent to an active control, and 3 found MI was not significantly better than a control. Two single arm studies reported improvements in health screening rates following an MI intervention. Conclusions MI shows promise for improving health screening uptake. However, given the mixed results, the variability amongst the studies and the limited number of randomized trials, it is difficult to discern the exact impact of MI on health screening uptake. Practice implications Future research is needed to better understand the impact of MI in this context. Such research would determine whether MI should be integrated into standard clinical practice for improving health screening uptake.
AB - Objective Health screenings, physical tests that diagnose disease, are underutilized. Motivational interviewing (MI) may increase health screening rates. This paper systematically reviewed the published articles that examined the efficacy of MI for improving health screening uptake. Methods Articles published before April 28, 2015 were reviewed from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. Study methodology, participant demographics, outcomes and quality were extracted from each article. Results Of the 1573 abstracts, 13 met inclusion criteria. Of the 13 studies, 6 found MI more efficacious than a control, 2 found MI more efficacious than a weak control yet equivalent to an active control, and 3 found MI was not significantly better than a control. Two single arm studies reported improvements in health screening rates following an MI intervention. Conclusions MI shows promise for improving health screening uptake. However, given the mixed results, the variability amongst the studies and the limited number of randomized trials, it is difficult to discern the exact impact of MI on health screening uptake. Practice implications Future research is needed to better understand the impact of MI in this context. Such research would determine whether MI should be integrated into standard clinical practice for improving health screening uptake.
KW - Health screenings
KW - Motivational interviewing
KW - Prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994850344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.027
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2016.08.027
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27599713
AN - SCOPUS:84994850344
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 100
SP - 190
EP - 198
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 2
ER -