Mortality among high-risk patients admitted with septic shock to U.S. teaching hospitals in July: Does the ‘July Effect’ exist?

  • Amina Saqib
  • , Uroosa Ibrahim
  • , Parshva Patel
  • , Abhyudaya Joshi
  • , Michel Chalhoub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The ‘July effect’ is a phenomenon of inferior delivery of care at teaching hospitals during July because of relative inexperience of new physicians. Objective To study the difference in mortality among septic shock patients during July and another month. Methods Using the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we estimated the difference in mortality among septic shock patients admitted during May and July from 2003 to 2011. Results 117,593 and 121,004 patients with septic shock were admitted to non-teaching and teaching hospitals, respectively, in May and July. High-risk patients had similar mortality rates in non-teaching hospitals and teaching hospitals. Mortality rates were higher in teaching versus non-teaching hospitals in high-risk patients both in May and July. Overall, mortality rates were higher in teaching versus non-teaching hospitals both in May and July. Conclusion Similar trends in mortality are observed in both settings in May and July and no “July effect” was observed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)110-113
Number of pages4
JournalHeart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Mar 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • July effect
  • Non-teaching hospital
  • Sepsis mortality
  • Septic shock
  • Teaching hospital

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mortality among high-risk patients admitted with septic shock to U.S. teaching hospitals in July: Does the ‘July Effect’ exist?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this