TY - JOUR
T1 - Molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS)
T2 - a generalizable framework for targeted radiotracers with theranostic implications
AU - Werner, Rudolf A.
AU - Bundschuh, Ralph A.
AU - Bundschuh, Lena
AU - Javadi, Mehrbod S.
AU - Higuchi, Takahiro
AU - Weich, Alexander
AU - Sheikhbahaei, Sara
AU - Pienta, Kenneth J.
AU - Buck, Andreas K.
AU - Pomper, Martin G.
AU - Gorin, Michael A.
AU - Lapa, Constantin
AU - Rowe, Steven P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)- and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET)-based imaging agents for prostate carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, are seeing rapidly expanding use. In addition to diagnostic applications, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy. While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography (CT) scans, the reader has to be aware of certain pitfalls. Adding to the complexity of the interpretation of those imaging agents, both normal biodistribution, and also false-positive and -negative findings differ between PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET radiotracers. Herein summarized under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS), two novel RADS classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging are described (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS). Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e., if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied, as well. In the present review, we will discuss the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT, briefly introduce PSMA- and SSTR-RADS, and define a potential future role of the umbrella framework MI-RADS compared to other classification systems.
AB - Both prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)- and somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET)-based imaging agents for prostate carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors, respectively, are seeing rapidly expanding use. In addition to diagnostic applications, both classes of radiotracers can be used to triage patients for theranostic endoradiotherapy. While interpreting PSMA- or SSTR-targeted PET/computed tomography (CT) scans, the reader has to be aware of certain pitfalls. Adding to the complexity of the interpretation of those imaging agents, both normal biodistribution, and also false-positive and -negative findings differ between PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET radiotracers. Herein summarized under the umbrella term molecular imaging reporting and data systems (MI-RADS), two novel RADS classifications for PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET imaging are described (PSMA- and SSTR-RADS). Notably, PSMA- and SSTR-RADS are structured in a reciprocal fashion, i.e., if the reader is familiar with one system, the other system can readily be applied, as well. In the present review, we will discuss the most common pitfalls on PSMA- and SSTR-targeted PET/CT, briefly introduce PSMA- and SSTR-RADS, and define a potential future role of the umbrella framework MI-RADS compared to other classification systems.
KW - Neuroendocrine tumor
KW - Positron emission tomography
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)
KW - RADS
KW - Reporting and data systems
KW - Somatostatin receptor (SSTR)
KW - Standardization
KW - Theranostics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052070712&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12149-018-1291-7
DO - 10.1007/s12149-018-1291-7
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30109562
AN - SCOPUS:85052070712
SN - 0914-7187
VL - 32
SP - 512
EP - 522
JO - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Annals of Nuclear Medicine
IS - 8
ER -