Molecular Diagnostic Outcomes from 700 Cases: What Can We Learn from a Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing?

Jill R. Murrell, Addie May I. Nesbitt, Samuel W. Baker, Kieran B. Pechter, Jorune Balciuniene, Xiaonan Zhao, Elizabeth H. Denenberg, Elizabeth T. DeChene, Chao Wu, Pushkala Jayaraman, Kajia Cao, Michael Gonzalez, Marcella Devoto, Alessandro Testori, John D. Monos, Matthew C. Dulik, Laura K. Conlin, Minjie Luo, Kristin McDonald Gibson, Qiaoning GuanMahdi Sarmady, Elizabeth Bhoj, Ingo Helbig, Elaine H. Zackai, Emma C. Bedoukian, Alisha Wilkens, Jennifer Tarpinian, Kosuke Izumi, Cara M. Skraban, Matthew A. Deardorff, Livija Medne, Ian D. Krantz, Bryan L. Krock, Avni B. Santani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

Clinical exome sequencing (CES) aids in the diagnosis of rare genetic disorders. Herein, we report the molecular diagnostic yield and spectrum of genetic alterations contributing to disease in 700 pediatric cases analyzed at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The overall diagnostic yield was 23%, with three cases having more than one molecular diagnosis and 2.6% having secondary/additional findings. A candidate gene finding was reported in another 8.4% of cases. The clinical indications with the highest diagnostic yield were neurodevelopmental disorders (including seizures), whereas immune- and oncology-related indications were negatively associated with molecular diagnosis. The rapid expansion of knowledge regarding the genome's role in human disease necessitates reanalysis of CES samples. To capture these new discoveries, a subset of cases (n = 240) underwent reanalysis, with an increase in diagnostic yield. We describe our experience reporting CES results in a pediatric setting, including reporting of secondary findings, reporting newly discovered genetic conditions, and revisiting negative test results. Finally, we highlight the challenges associated with implementing critical updates to the CES workflow. Although these updates are necessary, they demand an investment of time and resources from the laboratory. In summary, these data demonstrate the clinical utility of exome sequencing and reanalysis, while highlighting the critical considerations for continuous improvement of a CES test in a clinical laboratory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-286
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Molecular Diagnostics
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2022
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular Diagnostic Outcomes from 700 Cases: What Can We Learn from a Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Exome Sequencing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this