Mistreatment and the learning environment for medical students on general surgery clerkship rotations: What do key stakeholders think?

Manuel Castillo-Angeles, Ammara A. Watkins, Danilo Acosta, Julia L. Frydman, Lydia Flier, Alejandro Garces-Descovich, Michael J. Cahalane, Sidharta P. Gangadharan, Katharyn M. Atkins, Tara S. Kent

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Mistreatment has potential downstream effects on students. General surgery rotations tend to have a higher incidence of mistreatment reports. This study was undertaken to identify dominant themes contributing to a negative learning environment. Methods A qualitative study was performed using Delphi consensus technique to develop a discussion guide. Four focus groups were performed (n = 30 participants) with medical students, residents, nurses, and attending surgeons. Participants were selected using purposive-stratified criterion-based sampling. Results Multiple themes emerged: 1) unclear expectations for medical students; 2) passive mistreatment (neglect); 3) failure to integrate students into surgical team; 4) witnessed or experienced active mistreatment, 5) negative attitude of residents towards medical students’ lack of knowledge. Conclusions Medical student mistreatment persists and is a threat to the learning environment and individual learning process. Passive mistreatment (neglect) represents the most distressing component of mistreatment. These findings suggest a need for education aimed at surgical residents and others in the learning environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-312
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume213
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clerkship
  • Medical student
  • Mistreatment
  • Neglect
  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mistreatment and the learning environment for medical students on general surgery clerkship rotations: What do key stakeholders think?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this