Methodological Standards for the Design, Implementation, and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association

Mario Gaudino, Joanna Chikwe, Emilia Bagiella, Deepak L. Bhatt, Torsten Doenst, Stephen E. Fremes, Jennifer Lawton, Ruth M. Masterson Creber, Robert M. Sade, Brittany A. Zwischenberger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cardiac surgery presents specific methodological challenges in the design, implementation, and analysis of randomized controlled trials. The purposes of this scientific statement are to review key standards in cardiac surgery randomized trial design and implementation, and to provide recommendations for conducting and interpreting cardiac surgery trials. Recommendations include a careful evaluation of the suitability of the research question for a clinical trial, assessment of clinical equipoise, feasibility of enrolling a representative patient cohort, impact of practice variations on the safety and efficacy of the study intervention, likelihood and impact of crossover, and duration of follow-up. Trial interventions and study end points should be predefined, and appropriate strategies must be used to ensure adequate deliverability of the trial interventions. Every effort must be made to ensure a high completeness of follow-up; trial design and analytic techniques must be tailored to the specific research question and trial setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)E129-E142
JournalCirculation
Volume145
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 25 Jan 2022

Keywords

  • AHA Scientific Statements
  • equivalence trials
  • randomized controlled trials
  • surveys and questionnaires
  • therapeutic equipoise
  • thoracic surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Methodological Standards for the Design, Implementation, and Analysis of Randomized Trials in Cardiac Surgery: A Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this