TY - JOUR
T1 - Metabolic evaluation of stone diseasepatients
T2 - A practical approach
AU - Lifshitz, David A.
AU - Shalhav, Arieh L.
AU - Lingeman, James E.
AU - Evan, Andrew P.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - In the last three decades, minimally invasive techniques have progressed significantly; replacing traditional open surgery as the mainstay of stone disease surgical treatment. The challenge for the next millennium remains medical prevention of calcium urolithiasis, a field where less dramatic progress has been achieved during the same period of time. The purpose of this article is to provide the practicing urologist with current practical guidelines for the assessment and management of calcium urolithiasis patients. The recommendations are based on the latest available information regarding the pathogenesis, medical treatment options, and decision-making rationale when managing these challenging patients. Every urolithiasis patient should undergo a basic evaluation, which is considered the minimal essential diagnostic work-up, in order to rule out obvious, treatable systemic causes of urinary stone disease. All patients should be advised about conservative nonspecific preventive measures. High-risk stone patients should have a more extensive metabolic evaluation based on two 24-hour urine samples. Treatment protocols for each patient are tailored individually according to the metabolic evaluation findings.
AB - In the last three decades, minimally invasive techniques have progressed significantly; replacing traditional open surgery as the mainstay of stone disease surgical treatment. The challenge for the next millennium remains medical prevention of calcium urolithiasis, a field where less dramatic progress has been achieved during the same period of time. The purpose of this article is to provide the practicing urologist with current practical guidelines for the assessment and management of calcium urolithiasis patients. The recommendations are based on the latest available information regarding the pathogenesis, medical treatment options, and decision-making rationale when managing these challenging patients. Every urolithiasis patient should undergo a basic evaluation, which is considered the minimal essential diagnostic work-up, in order to rule out obvious, treatable systemic causes of urinary stone disease. All patients should be advised about conservative nonspecific preventive measures. High-risk stone patients should have a more extensive metabolic evaluation based on two 24-hour urine samples. Treatment protocols for each patient are tailored individually according to the metabolic evaluation findings.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032786658&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1089/end.1999.13.669
DO - 10.1089/end.1999.13.669
M3 - Article
C2 - 10608520
AN - SCOPUS:0032786658
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 13
SP - 669
EP - 678
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
IS - 9
ER -