TY - JOUR
T1 - Mechanical Properties of Soft Tissue Femoral Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
AU - Ahmad, Christopher S.
AU - Gardner, Thomas R.
AU - Groh, Megan
AU - Arnouk, Johnny
AU - Levine, William N.
PY - 2004/4
Y1 - 2004/4
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate femoral soft tissue fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: Femoral fixation devices have different ultimate strengths and slippage under cyclic loading. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty-three porcine femora were used to study interference screw (9), Endobutton (8), Rigidfix cross-pin (8), and Bio-Transfix cross-pin (8) fixation methods. Fixation slippage was evaluated under cyclical load from 50 N to 250 N using a materials testing machine. Ultimate load was determined with a single load to failure. Results: Total graft slippage was greater (P < .001) for the Rigidfix (6.02 ± 2.12 mm) and the interference screw (5.44 ± 3.25 mm) compared to the Endobutton (1.75 ± 0.97 mm) and the Bio-Transfix (1.14 ± 0.53 mm). All techniques showed the greatest slip-page during the first 100 cycles (Rigidfix 84%, Endobutton 70%, interference screw 56%, and Bio-Transfix 55%). The failure load for the interference screw technique (539 ± 114 N) was lower (P = .0008) than for the other 3 techniques (737 ± 140 N for Rigidfix, 746 ± 119 N for Bio-Transfix, and 864 ± 164 N for Endobutton). Conclusions: The interference screw and the Rigidfix fixation demonstrated inferior fixation biomechanics compared to the Bio-Transfix and the Endobutton techniques.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate femoral soft tissue fixation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hypothesis: Femoral fixation devices have different ultimate strengths and slippage under cyclic loading. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirty-three porcine femora were used to study interference screw (9), Endobutton (8), Rigidfix cross-pin (8), and Bio-Transfix cross-pin (8) fixation methods. Fixation slippage was evaluated under cyclical load from 50 N to 250 N using a materials testing machine. Ultimate load was determined with a single load to failure. Results: Total graft slippage was greater (P < .001) for the Rigidfix (6.02 ± 2.12 mm) and the interference screw (5.44 ± 3.25 mm) compared to the Endobutton (1.75 ± 0.97 mm) and the Bio-Transfix (1.14 ± 0.53 mm). All techniques showed the greatest slip-page during the first 100 cycles (Rigidfix 84%, Endobutton 70%, interference screw 56%, and Bio-Transfix 55%). The failure load for the interference screw technique (539 ± 114 N) was lower (P = .0008) than for the other 3 techniques (737 ± 140 N for Rigidfix, 746 ± 119 N for Bio-Transfix, and 864 ± 164 N for Endobutton). Conclusions: The interference screw and the Rigidfix fixation demonstrated inferior fixation biomechanics compared to the Bio-Transfix and the Endobutton techniques.
KW - Biomechanics
KW - Knee
KW - Ligament
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1942439016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0363546503261714
DO - 10.1177/0363546503261714
M3 - Article
C2 - 15090378
AN - SCOPUS:1942439016
SN - 0363-5465
VL - 32
SP - 635
EP - 640
JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine
IS - 3
ER -