TY - JOUR
T1 - Mapping the Landscape of Open Source Health Economic Models
T2 - A Systematic Database Review and Analysis: An ISPOR Special Interest Group Report
AU - Henderson, Raymond H.
AU - Sampson, Chris
AU - Pouwels, Xavier G.L.V.
AU - Harvard, Stephanie
AU - Handels, Ron
AU - Feenstra, Talitha
AU - Bhandari, Ramesh
AU - Sepassi, Aryana
AU - Arnold, Renée
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: Health economic models are crucial for health technology assessments to evaluate the value of medical interventions. Open-source models (OSMs), in which source code and calculations are publicly accessible, enhance transparency, efficiency, credibility, and reproducibility. This study systematically reviewed databases to map the landscape of available OSMs in health economics. Methods: A systematic database review was conducted, informed by guidance from ISPOR's OSM Special Interest Group. Eleven databases and specific OSM repositories were searched using predefined terms. Identified models were screened and duplicates were removed. Results: The search yielded 8664 hits, resulting in 182 unique OSMs. GitHub hosted the majority (74%), followed by Zenodo (11%). R was the predominant software platform (64%). Infectious disease was the most common application domain (29%). Markov models were the most frequent model type (49%). Licensing with Creative Commons was typical. Government and academic institutions were the primary sponsors, although many models lacked clear sponsorship. Conclusions: This review highlights the diversity and availability of open-source models (OSMs) in health economics, predominantly hosted on GitHub and developed using R. The models span various medical fields, with a strong focus on infectious diseases, oncology, and neurology. Ensuring clear licensing and standardized reporting is crucial to maximizing their impact. A combined approach of repository searches and traditional literature reviews provides a comprehensive method for identifying OSMs. Future efforts should enhance search strategies, improve reporting standards, and leverage OSMs to inform health policy decisions.
AB - Objectives: Health economic models are crucial for health technology assessments to evaluate the value of medical interventions. Open-source models (OSMs), in which source code and calculations are publicly accessible, enhance transparency, efficiency, credibility, and reproducibility. This study systematically reviewed databases to map the landscape of available OSMs in health economics. Methods: A systematic database review was conducted, informed by guidance from ISPOR's OSM Special Interest Group. Eleven databases and specific OSM repositories were searched using predefined terms. Identified models were screened and duplicates were removed. Results: The search yielded 8664 hits, resulting in 182 unique OSMs. GitHub hosted the majority (74%), followed by Zenodo (11%). R was the predominant software platform (64%). Infectious disease was the most common application domain (29%). Markov models were the most frequent model type (49%). Licensing with Creative Commons was typical. Government and academic institutions were the primary sponsors, although many models lacked clear sponsorship. Conclusions: This review highlights the diversity and availability of open-source models (OSMs) in health economics, predominantly hosted on GitHub and developed using R. The models span various medical fields, with a strong focus on infectious diseases, oncology, and neurology. Ensuring clear licensing and standardized reporting is crucial to maximizing their impact. A combined approach of repository searches and traditional literature reviews provides a comprehensive method for identifying OSMs. Future efforts should enhance search strategies, improve reporting standards, and leverage OSMs to inform health policy decisions.
KW - health economic models
KW - open source models
KW - reproducibility
KW - systematic database review
KW - transparency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=86000362922&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.019
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39952464
AN - SCOPUS:86000362922
SN - 1098-3015
JO - Value in Health
JF - Value in Health
ER -