Manchester procedure vs. Vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: A comparison

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	653-654
Number of pages	2
Journal	Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Volume	50
Issue number	9
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-199509000-00012
State	Published - Sep 1995

Access to Document

@article{dae37a823fbc4009904520ca2e3c3de7,

title = "Manchester procedure vs. Vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse: A comparison",

author = "Thomas, {Albert George} and Brodman, {Michael L.} and Dottino, {Peter R.} and Carol Bodian and Frederick Friedman and Eileen Bogursky",

year = "1995",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1097/00006254-199509000-00012",

language = "English",

volume = "50",

pages = "653--654",

journal = "Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey",

issn = "0029-7828",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manchester procedure vs. Vaginal hysterectomy for uterine prolapse

T2 - A comparison

AU - Thomas, Albert George

AU - Brodman, Michael L.

AU - Dottino, Peter R.

AU - Bodian, Carol

AU - Friedman, Frederick

AU - Bogursky, Eileen

PY - 1995/9

Y1 - 1995/9

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862877756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00006254-199509000-00012

DO - 10.1097/00006254-199509000-00012

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862877756

SN - 0029-7828

VL - 50

SP - 653

EP - 654

JO - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

JF - Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

IS - 9

ER -