Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

LORIS robustly predicts patient outcomes with immune checkpoint blockade therapy using common clinical, pathologic and genomic features

  • Tian Gen Chang
  • , Yingying Cao
  • , Hannah J. Sfreddo
  • , Saugato Rahman Dhruba
  • , Se Hoon Lee
  • , Cristina Valero
  • , Seong Keun Yoo
  • , Diego Chowell
  • , Luc G.T. Morris
  • , Eytan Ruppin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

119 Scopus citations

Abstract

Despite the revolutionary impact of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in cancer treatment, accurately predicting patient responses remains challenging. Here, we analyzed a large dataset of 2,881 ICB-treated and 841 non-ICB-treated patients across 18 solid tumor types, encompassing a wide range of clinical, pathologic and genomic features. We developed a clinical score called LORIS (logistic regression-based immunotherapy-response score) using a six-feature logistic regression model. LORIS outperforms previous signatures in predicting ICB response and identifying responsive patients even with low tumor mutational burden or programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 expression. LORIS consistently predicts patient objective response and short-term and long-term survival across most cancer types. Moreover, LORIS showcases a near-monotonic relationship with ICB response probability and patient survival, enabling precise patient stratification. As an accurate, interpretable method using a few readily measurable features, LORIS may help improve clinical decision-making in precision medicine to maximize patient benefit. LORIS is available as an online tool at https://loris.ccr.cancer.gov/.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1158-1175
Number of pages18
JournalNature Cancer
Volume5
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'LORIS robustly predicts patient outcomes with immune checkpoint blockade therapy using common clinical, pathologic and genomic features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this