Looking forward, looking back-10 years in urology

Maarten Albersen; Rufus Cartwright; Peter Choyke; S. Larry Goldenberg; Howard Goldman; Nathan Lawrentschuk; W. Marston Linehan; Declan Murphy; Harris Nagler; Peter Scardino; Linda Shortliffe; Arnulf Stenzl; Dan Theodorescu

doi:10.1038/nrurol.2014.263

Looking forward, looking back-10 years in urology

Maarten Albersen
, Rufus Cartwright
, Peter Choyke
, S. Larry Goldenberg
, Howard Goldman
, Nathan Lawrentschuk
, W. Marston Linehan
, Declan Murphy
, Harris Nagler
, Peter Scardino
, Linda Shortliffe
, Arnulf Stenzl
, Dan Theodorescu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

When Nature Reviews Urology launched in 2004, the field of urology was vastly different to that which we work in today, and the past 10 years have seen the field change immensely. As a specialty on the forefront of cutting-edge innovation, urologists are often the first to embrace new technologies and ideas. In this Viewpoint, members of the Nature Reviews Urology advisory board were asked what they thought was the most important change, issue or innovation in urology in the past 10 years, and what they expected to be the most important in the next decade. Here are their opinions.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	649-655
Number of pages	7
Journal	Nature Reviews Urology
Volume	11
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2014.263
State	Published - Nov 2014
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1038/nrurol.2014.263

Cite this

@article{07ad92b46d2247f7801a543ec69ce72c,

title = "Looking forward, looking back-10 years in urology",

abstract = "When Nature Reviews Urology launched in 2004, the field of urology was vastly different to that which we work in today, and the past 10 years have seen the field change immensely. As a specialty on the forefront of cutting-edge innovation, urologists are often the first to embrace new technologies and ideas. In this Viewpoint, members of the Nature Reviews Urology advisory board were asked what they thought was the most important change, issue or innovation in urology in the past 10 years, and what they expected to be the most important in the next decade. Here are their opinions.",

author = "Maarten Albersen and Rufus Cartwright and Peter Choyke and Goldenberg, \{S. Larry\} and Howard Goldman and Nathan Lawrentschuk and Linehan, \{W. Marston\} and Declan Murphy and Harris Nagler and Peter Scardino and Linda Shortliffe and Arnulf Stenzl and Dan Theodorescu",

year = "2014",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1038/nrurol.2014.263",

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "649--655",

journal = "Nature Reviews Urology",

issn = "1759-4812",

publisher = "Nature Research",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Looking forward, looking back-10 years in urology

AU - Albersen, Maarten

AU - Cartwright, Rufus

AU - Choyke, Peter

AU - Goldenberg, S. Larry

AU - Goldman, Howard

AU - Lawrentschuk, Nathan

AU - Linehan, W. Marston

AU - Murphy, Declan

AU - Nagler, Harris

AU - Scardino, Peter

AU - Shortliffe, Linda

AU - Stenzl, Arnulf

AU - Theodorescu, Dan

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - When Nature Reviews Urology launched in 2004, the field of urology was vastly different to that which we work in today, and the past 10 years have seen the field change immensely. As a specialty on the forefront of cutting-edge innovation, urologists are often the first to embrace new technologies and ideas. In this Viewpoint, members of the Nature Reviews Urology advisory board were asked what they thought was the most important change, issue or innovation in urology in the past 10 years, and what they expected to be the most important in the next decade. Here are their opinions.

AB - When Nature Reviews Urology launched in 2004, the field of urology was vastly different to that which we work in today, and the past 10 years have seen the field change immensely. As a specialty on the forefront of cutting-edge innovation, urologists are often the first to embrace new technologies and ideas. In this Viewpoint, members of the Nature Reviews Urology advisory board were asked what they thought was the most important change, issue or innovation in urology in the past 10 years, and what they expected to be the most important in the next decade. Here are their opinions.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84964315545

U2 - 10.1038/nrurol.2014.263

DO - 10.1038/nrurol.2014.263

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25348169

AN - SCOPUS:84964315545

SN - 1759-4812

VL - 11

SP - 649

EP - 655

JO - Nature Reviews Urology

JF - Nature Reviews Urology

IS - 11

ER -

Looking forward, looking back-10 years in urology

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this