Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Logistic regression generated probability estimates for trisomy 21 outcomes from serum alpha fetoprotein and beta human chorionic gonadotrophin: Simplification with increased specificity

  • Mark I. Evans
  • , Lawrence Chick
  • , Joseph E. O'Brien
  • , Elena Dvorin
  • , Mark P. Johnson
  • , Eric Krivchenia
  • , Robert J. Sokol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Traditional Gaussian approaches to biochemical screening make calculations very cumber-some. We have sought to develop a logistic regression mathematical model for the calculation of risk for trisomy 21 in multiple marker screening that would be more "user friendly." Biochemical screening data from 15,444 patients with confirmed normal outcomes and 28 with trisomy 21 were analyzed by logistic regression analysis (LRA) to produce a direct mathematical approach to risk calculation that combines the improvements in sensitivity and specificity already demonstrated by us with extreme value cumulative function surface fittings, but which can be extended for other exploratory variables. LRA yields a 71.4% sensitivity with a 95% specificity which is comparable to our previously published discriminant aneuploidy detection (DADs) approach; both are an improvement over the commonly used Gaussian approach of risk assessment. In our study population, LRA performed as well as DADs; both performed better than the Gaussian method, and LRA is a simpler approach.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume5
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Logistic regression analysis
  • Maternal serum alpha fetoprotein
  • Trisomy 21

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Logistic regression generated probability estimates for trisomy 21 outcomes from serum alpha fetoprotein and beta human chorionic gonadotrophin: Simplification with increased specificity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this