TY - JOUR
T1 - Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes
T2 - a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6)
AU - Buse, John B.
AU - Rosenstock, Julio
AU - Sesti, Giorgio
AU - Schmidt, Wolfgang E.
AU - Montanya, Eduard
AU - Brett, Jason H.
AU - Zychma, Marcin
AU - Blonde, Lawrence
PY - 2009/7/10
Y1 - 2009/7/10
N2 - Background: Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist. Methods: Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1·8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 μg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882. Findings: Mean baseline HbA1c for the study population was 8·2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA1c significantly more than did exenatide (-1·12% [SE 0·08] vs -0·79% [0·08]; estimated treatment difference -0·33; 95% CI -0·47 to -0·18; p<0·0001) and more patients achieved a HbA1c value of less than 7% (54% vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2·02; 95% CI 1·31 to 3·11; p=0·0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1·61 mmol/L [SE 0·20] vs -0·60 mmol/L [0·20]; estimated treatment difference -1·01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1·37 to -0·65; p<0·0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3·24 kg vs exenatide -2·87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0·448, p<0·0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1·93 vs 2·60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0·55; 95% CI 0·34 to 0·88; p=0·0131; 25·5% vs 33·6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode. Interpretation: Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations. Funding: Novo Nordisk A/S.
AB - Background: Unlike most antihyperglycaemic drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have a glucose-dependent action and promote weight loss. We compared the efficacy and safety of liraglutide, a human GLP-1 analogue, with exenatide, an exendin-based GLP-1 receptor agonist. Methods: Adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on maximally tolerated doses of metformin, sulphonylurea, or both, were stratified by previous oral antidiabetic therapy and randomly assigned to receive additional liraglutide 1·8 mg once a day (n=233) or exenatide 10 μg twice a day (n=231) in a 26-week open-label, parallel-group, multinational (15 countries) study. The primary outcome was change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c). Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00518882. Findings: Mean baseline HbA1c for the study population was 8·2%. Liraglutide reduced mean HbA1c significantly more than did exenatide (-1·12% [SE 0·08] vs -0·79% [0·08]; estimated treatment difference -0·33; 95% CI -0·47 to -0·18; p<0·0001) and more patients achieved a HbA1c value of less than 7% (54% vs 43%, respectively; odds ratio 2·02; 95% CI 1·31 to 3·11; p=0·0015). Liraglutide reduced mean fasting plasma glucose more than did exenatide (-1·61 mmol/L [SE 0·20] vs -0·60 mmol/L [0·20]; estimated treatment difference -1·01 mmol/L; 95% CI -1·37 to -0·65; p<0·0001) but postprandial glucose control was less effective after breakfast and dinner. Both drugs promoted similar weight losses (liraglutide -3·24 kg vs exenatide -2·87 kg). Both drugs were well tolerated, but nausea was less persistent (estimated treatment rate ratio 0·448, p<0·0001) and minor hypoglycaemia less frequent with liraglutide than with exenatide (1·93 vs 2·60 events per patient per year; rate ratio 0·55; 95% CI 0·34 to 0·88; p=0·0131; 25·5% vs 33·6% had minor hypoglycaemia). Two patients taking both exenatide and a sulphonylurea had a major hypoglycaemic episode. Interpretation: Liraglutide once a day provided significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control than did exenatide twice a day, and was generally better tolerated. The results suggest that liraglutide might be a treatment option for type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss and risk of hypoglycaemia are major considerations. Funding: Novo Nordisk A/S.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649666737&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60659-0
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60659-0
M3 - Article
C2 - 19515413
AN - SCOPUS:67649666737
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 374
SP - 39
EP - 47
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 9683
ER -