Lipoprotein(a), Inflammation, and Peripheral Arterial Disease in a Community-Based Sample of Older Men and Women (the InCHIANTI Study)

Stefano Volpato, Giovanni B. Vigna, Mary M. McDermott, Margherita Cavalieri, Cinzia Maraldi, Fulvio Lauretani, Stefania Bandinelli, Giovanni Zuliani, Jack M. Guralnik, Renato Fellin, Luigi Ferrucci

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

50 Scopus citations

Abstract

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) may represent an independent risk factor for peripheral arterial disease of the lower limbs (LL-PAD), but prospective data are scant. We estimated the association between baseline Lp(a) with prevalent and incident LL-PAD in older subjects from the InCHIANTI Study. LL-PAD, defined as an ankle-brachial index <0.90, was assessed at baseline and over a 6-year follow-up in a sample of 1,002 Italian subjects 60 to 96 years of age. Plasma Lp(a) and potential traditional and novel cardiovascular risk factors (including a score based on relevant inflammatory markers) were entered in multivariable models to assess their association with prevalent and incident LL-PAD. At baseline, Lp(a) concentration was directly related to the number of increased inflammatory markers (p <0.05). There were 125 (12.5%) prevalent cases of LL-PAD and 57 (8.3%) incident cases. After adjustment for potential confounders, participants in the highest quartile of the Lp(a) distribution (≥32.9 mg/dl) were more likely to have LL-PAD compared to those in the lowest quartile (odds ratio [OR] 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 3.33). The association was stronger (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.50 to 9.61) if LL-PAD was defined by harder criteria, namely an ankle-brachial index <0.70. Compared to subjects in the lowest Lp(a) quartile, those in the highest quartile showed a somewhat increased risk of incident LL-PAD (lowest quartile 7.7%, highest quartile 10.8%), but the association was not statistically significant (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.22). In conclusion, Lp(a) is an independent LL-PAD correlate in the cross-sectional evaluation, but further prospective studies in larger populations, with longer follow-up and more definite LL-PAD ranking, might be needed to establish a longitudinal association.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1825-1830
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Cardiology
Volume105
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jun 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lipoprotein(a), Inflammation, and Peripheral Arterial Disease in a Community-Based Sample of Older Men and Women (the InCHIANTI Study)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this