Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Linvoseltamab versus real-world International Myeloma Working Group standard-of-care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

  • Shaji Kumar
  • , Sundar Jagannath
  • , Katja C. Weisel
  • , Laura Rosiñol
  • , Xavier Leleu
  • , Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
  • , Efstathios Kastritis
  • , David S. Siegel
  • , Jorge Monge
  • , Juan Du
  • , Javier de la Rubia
  • , Pedro Asensi Cantó
  • , Jae Hoon Lee
  • , María Victoria Mateos
  • , Borja Puertas
  • , Alessandro Gozzetti
  • , Dominik Dytfeld
  • , Enrique M. Ocio
  • , Joan Blade
  • , Shuji Ozaki
  • Meral Beksac, Fernando Escalante, Madhu Nagaraj, Rafla Hassan, Nicolle Bonar, Paul Spin, Mostafa Shokoohi, Muhaimen Siddiqui, Di Wang, Kevin Hou, Michael E.D. West, Christian Hampp, Jeannette Green, Olivier Humblet, Alexander Breskin, James Harnett, Wenzhen Ge, Rachel E. Sobel, Jessica J. Jalbert, Glenn S. Kroog, Karen Rodriguez Lorenc, Qiufei Ma, Brian G.M. Durie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

LINKER-MM1 (NCT03761108) is a Phase 1/2 study of linvoseltamab, a human BCMA×CD3 bispecific antibody for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who are triple-class exposed (TCE) with ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy (3L+), or triple-class refractory (TCR). To contextualize efficacy data from LINKER-MM1, the Phase 2 linvoseltamab 200 mg cohort (N = 105) was compared with an international external control arm (ECA) comprising 203 patients from participating International Myeloma Working Group sites who met LINKER-MM1 eligibility criteria based on chart reviews. The ECA reflected real-world standard-of-care (RW SOC). An independent data review committee assessed data relevance, quality, and cohort comparability, while a separate independent central review committee evaluated response data. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between the linvoseltamab arm and the ECA. Linvoseltamab had a higher objective response rate (weighted odds ratio 3.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.9–4.1]) and longer median progression-free survival (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] 0.33 [95% CI: 0.28–0.40]), time to next treatment (wHR 0.34 [95% CI: 0.29–0.44]), and overall survival (wHR 0.72 [95% CI: 0.58–0.98]) than RW SOC. These findings highlight linvoseltamab’s potential as an effective treatment for 3L+ and TCE/TCR RRMM.

Original languageEnglish
Article number44
JournalBlood Cancer Journal
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linvoseltamab versus real-world International Myeloma Working Group standard-of-care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this