TY - JOUR
T1 - Light in the built environment
T2 - Potential role of circadian disruption in endocrine disruption and breast cancer
AU - Stevens, R. G.
AU - Rea, M. S.
N1 - Funding Information:
R.G. Stevens was supported by the US Department of Energy under contract DE–AC06–76RLO 1830 during much of the work on this paper. The authors thank John Bullough of the LRC and Norm Hansen of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for technical assistance, as well as George Brainard of Jefferson Medical College for helpful critique. R.G.S. also greatly appreciates valuable discussions and collaborations with Larry Anderson and Bary Wilson of PNNL over a period of many years on this topic.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Life in industrialized societies is primarily life inside buildings. Illumination from electric lighting in the built environment is quite different from solar radiation in intensity, spectral content, and timing during the 24-hour daily period. Humans evolved over millions of years with the day-night pattern of solar radiation as the primary circadian cue. This pattern maintained a 24-hour rhythm of melatonin release, as well as a host of other physiological rhythms including the sleep-wake cycle. Electric lighting in the built environment is generally more than sufficient for visual performance, but may be inappropriate for the maintenance of normal neuroendocrine rhythms in humans; e.g., insufficient during the day and too much at night. Lighting standards and engineering stress visual performance, whereas circadian function is not currently emphasized. The molecular biological research on the circadian clock and on mechanisms of phototransduction makes it clear that light for vision and light for circadian function are not identical systems. In particular, if electric lighting as currently employed contributes to 'circadian disruption' it may be an important cause of 'endocrine disruption' and thereby contribute to a high risk of breast cancer in industrialized societies.
AB - Life in industrialized societies is primarily life inside buildings. Illumination from electric lighting in the built environment is quite different from solar radiation in intensity, spectral content, and timing during the 24-hour daily period. Humans evolved over millions of years with the day-night pattern of solar radiation as the primary circadian cue. This pattern maintained a 24-hour rhythm of melatonin release, as well as a host of other physiological rhythms including the sleep-wake cycle. Electric lighting in the built environment is generally more than sufficient for visual performance, but may be inappropriate for the maintenance of normal neuroendocrine rhythms in humans; e.g., insufficient during the day and too much at night. Lighting standards and engineering stress visual performance, whereas circadian function is not currently emphasized. The molecular biological research on the circadian clock and on mechanisms of phototransduction makes it clear that light for vision and light for circadian function are not identical systems. In particular, if electric lighting as currently employed contributes to 'circadian disruption' it may be an important cause of 'endocrine disruption' and thereby contribute to a high risk of breast cancer in industrialized societies.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Buildings
KW - Circadian disruption
KW - Endocrine disruption
KW - Light
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034982529&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A:1011237000609
DO - 10.1023/A:1011237000609
M3 - Article
C2 - 11405333
AN - SCOPUS:0034982529
SN - 0957-5243
VL - 12
SP - 279
EP - 287
JO - Cancer Causes and Control
JF - Cancer Causes and Control
IS - 3
ER -