TY - JOUR
T1 - Laparoscopic antrectomy
T2 - A safe and definitive treatment in managing type 1 gastric carcinoids
AU - Jenny, Hillary E.
AU - Ogando, Paul A.
AU - Fujitani, Kenji
AU - Warner, Richard R.P.
AU - Divino, Celia M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Background Treatment for type 1 gastric carcinoid (T1GC) includes esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), polypectomy, and antrectomy, but few studies compare outcomes. This study assessed risk-benefit ratio to determine the most effective treatment for T1GC. Methods A retrospective review of 52 T1GC patients (ages 30 to 88 years; 77% female) presenting to Mount Sinai Medical Center between 2004 and 2012 was conducted. Patient demographics, procedures, and outcomes were reviewed, and patient satisfaction was assessed using a phone-administered validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Results Average EGDs needed per follow-up year was significantly lower for antrectomy than polypectomy or EGD surveillance (.395 vs 1.038 vs 1.380, P =.002). Antrectomy patients exhibited decreased recurrence risk than polypectomy patients (11% vs 44%, P =.049), despite longer follow-up time (6.10 vs 4.39 years, P =.023). Conclusions Antrectomy treats T1GC with lower recurrence risk and less postintervention monitoring, whereas allowing patients to avoid the discomfort of repeated EGD surveillance and anxiety over a lingering condition.
AB - Background Treatment for type 1 gastric carcinoid (T1GC) includes esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), polypectomy, and antrectomy, but few studies compare outcomes. This study assessed risk-benefit ratio to determine the most effective treatment for T1GC. Methods A retrospective review of 52 T1GC patients (ages 30 to 88 years; 77% female) presenting to Mount Sinai Medical Center between 2004 and 2012 was conducted. Patient demographics, procedures, and outcomes were reviewed, and patient satisfaction was assessed using a phone-administered validated questionnaire. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20 software. Results Average EGDs needed per follow-up year was significantly lower for antrectomy than polypectomy or EGD surveillance (.395 vs 1.038 vs 1.380, P =.002). Antrectomy patients exhibited decreased recurrence risk than polypectomy patients (11% vs 44%, P =.049), despite longer follow-up time (6.10 vs 4.39 years, P =.023). Conclusions Antrectomy treats T1GC with lower recurrence risk and less postintervention monitoring, whereas allowing patients to avoid the discomfort of repeated EGD surveillance and anxiety over a lingering condition.
KW - Antrectomy
KW - Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
KW - Gastric carcinoid
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961902997&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.040
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.040
M3 - Article
C2 - 26992358
AN - SCOPUS:84961902997
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 211
SP - 778
EP - 782
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -