Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions: The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ

Bong Kyoo Choi; Arturo Juárez-García

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9_1

Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions: The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ

Bong Kyoo Choi
, Arturo Juárez-García

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Widely used, standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocial working conditions (JCQ and ERIQ) may suffer from internal and external language issues, which imply variation in the interpretation of items among the users, including workers. This chapter presents various quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess to which extent both questionnaires are concerned by these languages issues. Also, the objective is to shed light on solution in order to improve the item wording so that these tools remain consistent to realize cross-comparisons and longitudinal comparisons.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Psychosocial Health, Work and Language
Subtitle of host publication	International Perspectives Towards Their Categorizations at Work
Publisher	Springer International Publishing
Pages	3-18
Number of pages	16
ISBN (Electronic)	9783319505459
ISBN (Print)	9783319505435
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9_1
State	Published - 1 Jan 2017
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9_1

Cite this

@inbook{ef932342398d45e2b79c3ef85d453384,

title = "Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions: The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ",

abstract = "Widely used, standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocial working conditions (JCQ and ERIQ) may suffer from internal and external language issues, which imply variation in the interpretation of items among the users, including workers. This chapter presents various quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess to which extent both questionnaires are concerned by these languages issues. Also, the objective is to shed light on solution in order to improve the item wording so that these tools remain consistent to realize cross-comparisons and longitudinal comparisons.",

author = "Choi, \{Bong Kyoo\} and Arturo Ju{\'a}rez-Garc{\'i}a",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer International Publishing AG 2017.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9\_1",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319505435",

pages = "3--18",

booktitle = "Psychosocial Health, Work and Language",

publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions: The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ. / Choi, Bong Kyoo; Juárez-García, Arturo.
Psychosocial Health, Work and Language: International Perspectives Towards Their Categorizations at Work. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 3-18.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter › peer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions

T2 - The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ

AU - Choi, Bong Kyoo

AU - Juárez-García, Arturo

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Widely used, standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocial working conditions (JCQ and ERIQ) may suffer from internal and external language issues, which imply variation in the interpretation of items among the users, including workers. This chapter presents various quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess to which extent both questionnaires are concerned by these languages issues. Also, the objective is to shed light on solution in order to improve the item wording so that these tools remain consistent to realize cross-comparisons and longitudinal comparisons.

AB - Widely used, standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocial working conditions (JCQ and ERIQ) may suffer from internal and external language issues, which imply variation in the interpretation of items among the users, including workers. This chapter presents various quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess to which extent both questionnaires are concerned by these languages issues. Also, the objective is to shed light on solution in order to improve the item wording so that these tools remain consistent to realize cross-comparisons and longitudinal comparisons.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85019884460

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-50545-9_1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85019884460

SN - 9783319505435

SP - 3

EP - 18

BT - Psychosocial Health, Work and Language

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -

Language issues in standard questionnaires for assessing psychosocialworking conditions: The case of the JCQ and the ERIQ

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this